“The proposals offered thus far for adoption at the UN Paris conference to drastically reduce world GHGs and hydrocarbon use by 2050 are fatally flawed, unrealistic and impossible to achieve without destroying the world economy.”
[Editor note: The first part of this post ran yesterday at MasterResource.]
Policy prescriptions for drastically reducing carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, to keep global temperatures from increasing by 2° or 3° Celsius (3.5 to 5.5° Fahrenheit), are based on unverified computer model projections, which are themselves based on the much-contested assumption that carbon dioxide now controls Earth’s climate.
Even if that assumption is correct, however, eliminating fossil fuels over the next 35 years would reduce world per capita GDP to only about 4% of what it is otherwise forecast to be, under a “business as usual” scenario.…
Continue Reading“The UN’s ‘Deep Decarbonization Pathways’ … will require a radical transformation of economic and energy systems by 2050, through massive declines in carbon intensity in all sectors. It is not about modest or incremental change [but] … major changes in every country’s energy and production systems, over both the mid-term and long-term.”
Radical Islamist terrorists just maimed and murdered hundreds of people in Paris, dozens more in Mali, still more in other nations. They promise more atrocities in the United States and around the globe.
Meanwhile some 40,000 bureaucrats, politicians, scientists, lobbyists, activists and journalists plan to enjoy five-star Parisian hotels and restaurants, while attending COP21, the twenty-first UN Climate Change Conference, from November 30 through December 11. Like President Obama, they insist that humanity faces no greater threat than climate change.…
Continue ReadingThe Alliance for Wise Energy Decisions (AWED) is an informal coalition of individuals and organizations interested in improving national, state, and local energy and environmental policies. Our premise is that technical matters like these should be addressed by using Real Science (please consult WiseEnergy.org for more information).
A key element of AWED’s efforts is public education. Towards that end, every three weeks we put together a newsletter to balance what is found in the mainstream media about energy and the environment. We appreciate MasterResource for their assistance in publishing this information.
—————————
Some of the more interesting articles in this issue are:
Report: Which States Lose the Most to Wind Welfare?
3% of wind developers earnings go to the community
Wind farm noise report ‘parallels VW scandal’
Negative Health Effects of Noise from Wind Turbines: Some Background
Research into Wind Turbine Infrasound
Wind Energy: Unreliable and Expensive
Iberdrola: “five instances of international fraud and corruption”
The Truth About One State’s Energy Policy (which applies to all)
Marxism and Ecology: Common Fonts of a Great Transition
Freeman Dyson on climate change, interstellar travel, fusion, and more
Study: Perspectives of Uncertainty in Climate Science
Prominent Scientists Declare Climate Claims to be “Irrational”
Climate Rationalization, Beliefs and Denialism
Climate Wars and the Damage to Science
French Science Society: The battle against global warming: an absurd, costly and pointless crusade
NASA Temperature Datasets “Massively Altered”
An Outbreak of Sanity (re Sea Level Rise)
Greed Energy Economics:
Report: Which States Lose the Most to Wind Welfare?…
Continue Reading