A Free-Market Energy Blog

Edison to Enron (Bradley): Some Thoughts

By Lynne Kiesling -- July 25, 2012

Consider the preconceptions that surface in your mind when you read the name “Enron”. Chances are that they are negative, and not particularly nuanced — fraudulent business activity, tarnishing the idea of free markets by trying to manipulate them using the political process, and so on.

If that’s true for you, then you are probably in a pretty similar mental space to mine when I started reading Rob Bradley’s Edison to Enron: Energy Markets and Political Strategies. Rob’s detailed and thoroughly researched book is a well-told analysis of the valuable and interesting regulatory and business history that formed the backdrop of Enron’s spectacular failure.

Samuel Insull, Father of Modern Electricity

The name of the book is somewhat misleading, because the first third of the book focuses not on Thomas Edison but on Samuel Insull. Insull, the oldest son of a working class family in Victorian England, emigrated to the U.S. (at age 21) after several years of a successful financial career in London.

Insull brought, and sharpened, his business acumen to complement Edison’s inventive creativity. Together they built the company that was renamed General Electric in 1892. But it was Insull’s business genius after he left the manufacturing side of the business to enter the distribution side (integrated from power generation to delivery), which accelerated the electrification of the country.

Rob tells Insull’s story extremely well, and provides extensive links to supporting material that illustrates how important Insull’s contributions were to Edison’s success individually and as a business/set of businesses.

With his analysis Rob also argues that Insull’s business skill generated substantial social value (i.e., consumer surplus as well as profit). That point is incontrovertible, but the story is not told often enough or well enough, and Rob has done so here.

I appreciated this part of the book in particular because although I am familiar with Insull’s biography, I did not realized that his business model advocacy had shaped our modern electricity industry so dramatically; for example, Insull consistently pursued acquisitions and consolidation that led to reduced costs through economies of scale, but always advocated for pairing those moves with reductions in retail prices to consumers. The companies he headed that followed this strategy profited while charging lower prices, in the absence of formal economic regulation.

Insull was, though, always an advocate for regulation, largely because he worried that rising debt service costs would make it difficult to pursue this model.

Insull’s career and life ended tragically, with him exercising unusual poor business judgment while simultaneously being too optimistic about economic prospects in the US in the early 1930s. His earlier career had been characterized by an emphasis on hard work, self-help, provision of quality service at affordable prices, and provision of a healthy working environment in return for the hard work of employers. His career ended with a successful defense against a federal lawsuit, which combined with the wealth effects of the stock market crash and Depression to leave him bankrupt.

Enter Ken Lay

Rob uses Insull’s history as a foil for Ken Lay’s story. The remainder of the book digs into the origins of the natural gas long-distance pipeline and local distribution industries, the mergers and acquisitions that would create Williams Energy and Enron, and Ken Lay’s role in this progression from the 1960s through the mid-1980s.

Rob’s narrative combines business history with biography as he traces the individual and corporate interactions, personalities, and changes. Lay’s background as a Ph.D. economist, an academic, and a policy adviser in Washington, DC, meant that he brought a diverse range of skills and experience to the natural gas industry. Given his experience of working closely with Lay, Rob can also attest to his temperament and his management style and how those combined with his experience to help him transform the natural gas industry.

The point at which Lay’s story stops here parallels Insull’s business and personal success, and in the next volume Rob will pick up the tale and finish the parallel by relating his personal experience of Enron’s demise and the extent to which Lay exercised unusually poor judgment. I look forward to reading the sequel to this analysis.

Book’s Epilogue

Another valuable aspect of Rob’s work in this volume is the book’s long epilogue, which pulls back and analyzes the period he’s covered (1881-1984) through the lens of what Rob calls “political capitalism”. Conveniently, Capitalism at Work was the first volume in this “Political Capitalism” trilogy. The epilogue here draws on the theoretical political economy framework Rob constructed in that first volume, a synthesis of energy economics, Austrian economics, and public choice theory.

Rob uses this framework to “differentiate market capitalism from political capitalism”, an analysis that’s very timely and relevant today as we debate the role of politics in business and the unsustainable proliferation of cronyism in the economy.


Edison to Enron synthesizes business history, economic history, biography, and political economy to tell a compelling tale of innovation and new value creation in two energy industries, as well as increasing regulation and political capitalism in them.

If you teach an energy economics class, the epilogue can be a useful reading to get your class thinking about the history of innovation and regulation and their implications in energy industries. The volume does have an unfinished feel to it, as you would expect from the second book in a trilogy, but it does not detract from the detailed analysis presented here.


Lynne Kiesling is a Distinguished Senior Lecturer in the Department of Economics at Northwestern University, where she is also Faculty Member in the Northwestern Institute on Complex Systems (NICO) and Faculty Affiliate in the Center for the Study of Industrial Organization (CSIO). In these capacities, she teaches undergraduate courses in principles of economics, energy economics, environmental economics, and history of economic thought

Dr. Kiesling is the author or co-author of many academic journal articles, book chapters, policy studies, and public interest comments. Her book, Deregulation, Innovation, and Market Liberalization: Electricity Regulation in a Continually Evolving Environment, was published by Routledge in 2008.

Lynne blogs about economics with an emphasis on energy and antitrust as the editor/owner of Knowledge Problem, where this review originally appeared.


  1. rbradley  

    Thanks Lynne for actually reading a long book, something that even scholars are seldom doing these days!

    You correctly pointed out that Insull advocated franchise regulation to increase investor confidence to lower his debt costs. But I have come to appreciate how much Insull’s call for statewide public-utility regulation came from the threat of existing regulation.

    He faced two threats. One was from local regulation such as a punitive rate ceiling not based on public utility regulation but on political whim. The other threat was municipalization.

    Insull saw statewide PU regulation as the lesser of regulatory evils and a process by which he had more constitutional protection.
    The theme ‘one intervention leads to another’ comes into play here in terms of potential, not only actual, regulation.


  2. Lynne Kiesling: Edison to Enron (Bradley): Some Thoughts | JunkScience.com  

    […] MasterResource Share this:PrintEmailMoreStumbleUponTwitterFacebookDiggRedditLike this:LikeBe the first to like this. This entry was posted in Capitalists against capitalism, Carbon trading, Clean energy, Climate Change and tagged baptists and bootleggers, carbon scam, climate fraud, energy subsidies, enron, government subsidies, subsidy farming. Bookmark the permalink. ← Robert Bradley Jr.: Dear League of Conservation Voters: Even Joe Romm advises against the term ‘denier’ […]


Leave a Reply