A Free-Market Energy Blog

Tom Stacy: Heroic Ohioan for Affordable Electricity

By Sherri Lange -- April 14, 2016

“Protest loudly, politely, and often, and sue at every turn. Expose greed and support sound science…. Finally, always speak from a position of integrity and truth and NEVER exaggerate the way the wind industry does. It is possible, though not expected, that eventually truth will win the day. Be proud because you have the truth on your side – whether you win or not.”

– Interview with Tom Stacy (below)

“Finally, the wind lobby is telling the press and environmental groups that freezing the mandate will cost tens of thousands of renewables manufacturing jobs in Ohio. But the truth is Ohio has manufacturing jobs because we have the infrastructure, the natural resources, the education opportunities and the skills to compete in manufacturing. More expensive electricity would hurt that competitive advantage and cost Ohio jobs on net.” Such is the usual fare from Tom Stacy, a determined Ohioan for consumers and taxpayers (read more here).

My interview with Tom and his work on the wind power issue follows.

Q. Let’s start with the most obvious question: how did you get energized by the wind industry?

A. I had an industrial machinery background, working with machines that melt plastic pellets and inject that molten material at high pressures into molds (injection molding).  The more a client could utilize those high tech, expensive machines, the cheaper became the products they spit out every few seconds. That’s not much different from electricity system economics (load factor economics). But that simple concept is lost on most electricity regulators and lawmakers today.

Then something came out of the blue. In 2007, it came to light that a wind developer was sneaking around to the less affluent farms in the area near my home, signing up needy and greedy farm owners below the radar of the community at large. I started digging into the claims the wind industry made in defense of its land use, public nuisance, and high costs.

Q. What did you find?

A. Exaggerations and unsubstantiated claims of benefits across the board. I then networked with utility engineers, analysts and leaders who confirmed my findings. At that point I alerted the residential community in the area who then pressed local zoning and planning officials to prevent the project from being built. This was going to negatively affect our views and lifestyles and thus our property values.

Q. And you fought back?

A. Yes, I personally did. The developers snuck out of town, but not before characterizing my cause as “NIMBY”–not-in-my-back-yard.

My response was to take the issue to state lawmakers and implore they enact uniform minimum siting and permitting rules across the state. For better or worse, it let us fight the industry in Columbus, Ohio rather than over and over in every township in Northwest Ohio as I moved from the purported NIMBYism to more of a ratepayer and residential property owner watchdog team member for the state’s electricity consumers.

Q. What organizations are you involved with?

 A. Interesting question. Involvement and membership are different things, I guess.

I would say I am involved with NRECA (National Rural Electric Cooperatives Association), ACRE (Action Committee for Rural Electrification, have been involved with the ASME (American Society of Mechanical Engineers) Energy Policy Committee, am involved with state lawmakers, the Ohio Township Association, The Ohio County Commissioners Association, The Buckeye (Policy) Institute, with the Institute for Energy Research, and with IICCUSA.org (Interstate Informed Citizens Coalition).

Q. And you founded a group….

A. I founded Save Western Ohio and have consulted for several other citizens groups in counties across NW Ohio. I am a board member for National Wind Watch (wind-watch.org).

I guess you would say I am “involved” with PUCO (Public Utilities Commission of Ohio), PJM (the regional grid operator in Pennsylvania New Jersey and Maryland (and ten other states), and FERC (Federal Energy Regulatory Commission), as well.  It just depends on your definition of involvement.

Q. Is this a paid position, or are you a community activist?

A. Yes and yes. I am one of very few who dropped out of the private business sector to pursue self-education on the electricity system – its physics, its markets, its regulatory environment and it’s green image marketing – with the intent to become a self-funded “anti-lobbyist” on behalf of electricity ratepayers.

I would say I am a sort of a jack of all electricity trades and master of none, but it truly is the interplay between facets of the sector where a lot of money changes hands unearned and where the opportunity for greater efficiency is hidden. What really drives me is eliminating waste – whether by exposing and fighting the new-fangled legalized robbery of corporate cronyism, the old fashioned, illegal kind, or anything in between.

The electricity system is very complex and not held accountable very well to market mechanisms so there is more opportunity for making money without earning it in this sector than in most others.  So yes, I have been paid something for some consulting work with local opposition groups and by some policy groups as well.  Unfortunately it hasn’t added up to a sustainable career at this point so I am headed back to the plastics industry or some other private sector productive endeavour to try to rebuild a nest egg for retirement.

Q. You have been an energy educator and activist for a long time: are there fringe benefits, or has it all been a chore?

A. It has been very exciting in many ways. The opportunity to dig in and learn, and then gradually be able to referee and advocate effectively at various levels makes me feel useful to society as a whole. It has very much been a calling over the past 8+ years – just not a calling I am willing to go bankrupt to pursue indefinitely.

I might, but my kids deserve better. It is also a blessing (and a chore) to have learned a lot more than most lawmakers and the general public about this matter.

It feels like I have earned some expertise and credentials through the “Tom Stacy blind squirrel university extension office” and that I might be able to find a meaningful career path here. But I haven’t. And of course I receive many thank you notes and sincere thanks from people who live in a rural setting and from lawmakers who want to do the right things but don’t have time to understand the bulk electricity system.

It’s really bittersweet at this point. I would love to spend more time learning, teaching, advocating and possibly work as a regulator. But it would have to pay the bills.

 Q. What is your educational or vocational background, and has this helped you in the debate?

A. I have a bachelor’s degree in Industrial Marketing from the Ohio State University (1989). I have always had a head for physics, economics and math of all kinds although I never excelled academically.

And yes, my business education has definitely helped me at every turn. Managerial accounting principles, marketing, statistics, macro-economics and finance courses come into play daily.  The scholastic engineering and math content also provided some foundation, which blossomed into more useful tools when applied in the private sector.

Working in the plastics industry I interfaced with people of all stations and learned to speak to people in terms that matched their experience and degree of technical prowess.  There was a bit of a mentor there – a guy named Harold Luttman with Engel North America in Guelph, ONT – who really ignited my desire to understand the very technical as well as the big picture aspects of the business. I’ve never been as bright as he is but have always aspired to be.

Q. How has your involvement made a difference, or is that difference to come?

A. Ouch! Of course it has made a difference!

But has it met my expectations for the difference I envisioned making? Not at all. Perhaps I suffer grandiose delusions about influence. It’s quite hard to make a difference.

I still believe that given the right breaks I could help make very meaningful changes at the state, RTO/ISO (Independent Systems Operator/Regional Transmission Organization), and federal regulatory levels. I believe the markets need to be reformed and that ratepayers ought to control the balance of power in that reformation.

I am not a purist when it comes to “free markets” for electricity either. There are good reasons the attributes of free markets that optimize trade efficiency don’t apply well in the electricity system. Utilities have traditionally taken advantage of that fact at the expense of ratepayers and that is, I think, unfair and regrettable.

Q. Were you a political partisan before wind power ‘changed your life’?

A. Yes.  I was a conservative. But the wind industry isn’t as much partisan as it is a cancer of politics as a whole.

Q. What have been your most challenging moments as you travel through educating others? What to date has been most rewarding?

A. My biggest challenge has been to learn to accept that others have their own style, priorities and comfort zones that must frame their work on this issue. I don’t want to be dogmatic, but still feel groups should not attack wind from every conceivable angle, rather pick the one or two aspects of it that the population at large may be sympathetic to.

I believe those are the implications of intermittently available fuel (wind currents) on cost, as evidenced by the industry’s perennial dependence on future-taxpayer-supported subsidy (and current-ratepayer-supported subsidy) with no end in sight.

The third area that might have previously resonated with a peripheral percentage of rural people, property rights, is now an area of burgeoning interest, and facts are facts. Property rights have been consistently diminished within sight lines of wind installations, and while this argument may have been discounted as weak in the past, folks are now marching into the courts with regularity. Still city folk – who make up the bulk of voters – have a hard time rallying behind complaints about noise from their countryside counterparts.

 Q. How do you personally envision the wind turbine fiasco unraveling?

 A. Sadly, I feel it must run its course for another five to ten years because big government, big media and well-cloaked corporate greed work together effectively to create a false image and spread that image across the population.  Scientific truth has few benefactors.  Even utilities that own coal, nuclear, hydro and gas fired generators today have found a way continue to push their rising costs onto ratepayers and buy some green energy armour in the process.

 Q. Tell us about an interesting or outside the box encounter in the last few years.

A. After multiple unsuccessful attempts to be given an audience by a new head regulator, a lawmaker pushed that regulator to meet with me. When we met, I explained the economics supporting my imposed cost theorem. He didn’t agree the effect is real even though it is as irrefutable as basic addition. Still he must have recognized something I was doing as solid because he promised to help me find a career in the regulatory sector – albeit a promise that fizzled.

 Q. What advice would you give to a community that has just been permitted?

A. Protest loudly, politely and often, and sue at every turn. Expose greed and support sound science.  Slow the developer down by finding ways to raise doubt in the minds of those putting money on the line for which they expect a handsome return. You can’t beat Wall Street.  You have to create perceived risk of loss to make Wall Street turn away from a project or a technology.

Keep trying to get laws revised. Bills introduced to strengthen setback laws or compromise the expected handouts if passed work wonders.

Finally, always speak from a position of integrity and truth and NEVER exaggerate the way the wind industry does. It is possible, though not expected, that eventually truth will win the day. Be proud because you have the truth on your side – whether you win or not.

Q. What is your favorite quote about wind power? 

A. Of the seemingly limitless laws elected officials can create and modify, the laws of physics are not among them.

[Interviewer’s favorite quote by Tom Stacy: “If Ohio has only 0.75% of the nation’s installed wind capacity how can the wind industry claim Ohio wind manufacturing jobs rely on Ohio’s renewable mandate?”]


  1. Mary Ann Hartzler  

    Nice job Tom! Your work and ability to get to people in many areas have certainly strenghtened the ability and knowledge of others in the wind battle.

    I wish you well with as you turn some attention to your prior work. However I know that you will continue to be ready and willing to help whoever you can as the long battle continues.

    Mary Ann


  2. Kevin Ledet  

    The members of Greenwich Neighbors United (GNU) want to thank you for your commitment to the truth. You are correct to state that the truth is powerful and hopefully, one day, it will prevail. Some community members bring up the presentations that you and Kevon Martis made at one of GNU’s informational meetings in Greenwich, Ohio. Information that is never discussed from the wind developers side. True information has a way of dispelling falsehood and half truth. Keep up the good work. Kevin Ledet


  3. Mary Kay Klausing  

    Great article Tom! You have been a “godsend” to our Ohio communities fighting the wind industry. You are a wealth of knowledge for all us trying to keep these wind projects at bay. Thank you so much for coming to our defense whenever we ask for help. I have been privileged to be apart of several community meetings where you have been awesome with your knowledge & silencing the wind industry. Thank You!


  4. Joe and Linda Hughes  

    Tom is a friend–and that friendship began in 2007 when Babcock and Brown intended to invade our Logan County, Ohio, community with an industrial wind facility. Tom was a major force and influence in that fight–that wind factory never materialized. His knowledge, expertise, contacts, and willingness to advise and help others have been a lifeline to so many individuals and communities now fighting big wind. Thank you, Tom.


  5. Jeremy Kitson  

    Tom has been instrumental for our group Citizens for Clear Skies of Van Wert County, OH. He has become a major mentor to me in this fight. His immense knowledge about the economics and politics of wind is unparalleled. I have learned a lot in my short 3 months all at the guidance and challenges Tom has given me. He is a man of great integrity and knowledge. What is most impressive about Tom is how he seems to be cool under pressure, you just can’t rattle him. He is always calm, factual, and to the point. That is probably the biggest lesson I need to learn from him. My favorite Tom line is, “remember the truth is on our side”. I am grateful to have the opportunity to have met and work along side of Tom. Thanks for all you do and thanks for this article!


  6. Molly Buettner  

    Thank you Tom, for all that you have done for our community in Van Wert county. We have asked and you have delivered the knowledge and advice that are needed to fight this affliction that seems to be never ceasing.
    Your relentless search for the truth, your temperament when dealing with the wind developers, and your willingness to put yourself out there, are attributes for us all to emulate.
    In a perfect world, where truth outweighs everything else, this fight would be over, but thus we do not live is a perfect world.
    Good luck in all of your future endeavors.


  7. Wendy Powers  

    Mr. Stacy has accomplished all his homework is stepping up to save our grandchildren from paying a bill which will soon come due. Higher electric rates, defaulted government loans, and the rest of this insanity. Thank You Mr. Stacy for being a beacon of truthfulness in this sea of lies.


  8. Dawn Davis  

    Thank you, Tom, for speaking the truth so eloquently. You have been a tremendous resource for so many of us. Some day, the truth will prevail. All of us hope that day comes sooner, rather than later.


  9. Linda Baker  

    Thank you, Mr. Stacy for the sound wisdom you have given the Ohio City group against this plague. I read a line recently that stated, “The less you know about wind energy, the more you’ll like it. ” Well I have found the more I learn about wind energy, the more I dislike it. Knowing the truth and how to present it makes all the difference in winning this battle.


  10. Bill Katakis  

    First Energy is demanding billions in bailouts from ratepayers for Davis Besse and some coal plants. Wind right now, in Ohio, is cheaper than the electricity that comes from Davis Besse. After the massive welfare bailout to F.E. and Davis Besse, and the coal power plants they own, tall and large wind turbines will continue to be, as it has been, the cheapest power source you can build in Ohio. PUCO has trimmed down the welfare request by First Energy, but this market is supposed to be deregulated, meaning a free market. Yet Kasich has pushed PUCO to give F.E. welfare. It will be fought. Read the Edison Institutes report on threats to the utility industry’s profit model, it clearly identifies solar power as the biggest threat to both nuclear and coal power. While nuclear and coal get more expensive, the cost of solar continues to fall as panel efficiency goes up, and price per watt drops at predictable rates. Expect legislative obstacles to solar to increase as the utility industries pays our legally bribed legislators in Ohio to pass laws against it. Right now, today, solar power in Ohio is cheaper than nuclear power. The corruption we should aim to eliminate , is the corruption of our own subjective political perspective , and the outright dishonor of our legislators.


  11. Tom Stacy On Wind Power: At the (Ohio) Grassroots - Master Resource  

    […] Stacy is, indeed, a “heroic Ohioan for affordable electricity.” Underpaid and overworked, he speaks truth to wind power at  every opportunity in his […]


  12. Trump adviser's emails shed light on shadowy anti-clean energy network  

    […] April 16, 2017, Fisher responded to an email chain from Rep. Seitz and Tom Stacy, an Ohio-based anti-wind activist turned paid consultant for the fossil fuel-funded Institute for Energy Research (IER). Fisher worked at IER prior to his […]


  13. Trump Adviser's Emails Shed Light on Koch-Tied Clean Energy Attacks - Koch Vs Clean  

    […] April 16, 2017, Fisher responded to an email chain from Rep. Seitz and Tom Stacy, an Ohio-based anti-wind activist turned paid consultant for the fossil fuel-funded Institute for Energy Research (IER). Fisher worked at IER prior to his […]


  14. Tom Stacy: A top anti-wind activist got paid by a fossil fuel funded group  

    […] “So yes, I have been paid something for some consulting work with local opposition groups and by some policy groups as well,” as Stacy said in a 2016 interview. […]


  15. Attack on Tom Stacy: "No Good Deed Goes Unpunished" (anti-wind effort smeared by crony environmentalist) - Master Resource  

    […] “So yes, I have been paid something for some consulting work with local opposition groups and by some policy groups as well,” as Stacy said in a 2016 interview. […]


Leave a Reply