Search Results for: "climate deaths"
Relevance | DateThe Death Spiral for Climate Alarmism Continues
By Kenneth P. Green -- June 2, 2010 14 Comments“We have at most ten years—not ten years to decide upon action, but ten years to alter fundamentally the trajectory of global greenhouse emissions.”
– James Hansen, “The Threat to the Planet,” New York Review of Books, July 13, 2006.
“Desperation is setting in among climate alarmists who by their own math can see that the window is rapidly closing on ‘saving the planet’.”
– Kenneth Green, “A Death Spiral for Climate Alarmism, Redux?” MasterResource, September 30, 2009.
Global Warming is Responsible for … Everything Bad! (climate alarmism’s PR problem in one list)
By Robert Bradley Jr. -- February 27, 2010 5 Comments[Editor note: Hat tip to Michael Fumento at globalwarming.org for his recommendation of Number Watch’s listing below. This site advertises itself as a depot for “all about the scares, scams, junk, panics, and flummery cooked up by the media, politicians, bureaucrats, so-called scientists and others who try to confuse you with wrong numbers.”]
Of course U.S. EPA is correct in their finding that the human influence on climate (aka anthropogenic global warming) poses a threat to human welfare. And no wonder why Obama science advisor John Holdren has not disowned his prediction that as many as one billion people could perish by 2020 from climate change.
We surrender. We apologize. We bucked the science as long as we could and just have nowhere to hide. And Dr.…
Continue ReadingClimate Change: The Resilience Option (far better than climate stasis)
By Kenneth P. Green -- October 23, 2009 4 CommentsSetting The Economist Straight on Developing Countries and (Anthropogenic) Climate Change
By Indur Goklany -- October 17, 2009 8 CommentsLast month, an article in The Economist tried to make the case that global warming is or ought to be an urgent concern for developing countries. My letter protesting the speculative and unsubstantiated claims of the piece was prominently published in the current issue. Although the editors of The Economist changed my title, dropped the references, and made it somewhat briefer, the printed version is quite faithful to the spirit of the original, which is available here.
For the public record, my full version is provided below.
A badly developed climate backgrounder
SIR — The Economist’s article, A bad climate for development (September 17), which also serves as a backgrounder for an online debate on climate change, is not only selective in the information it presents, it is riddled with speculation and unsubstantiated claims.…
Continue Reading