A Free-Market Energy Blog

California: Climate Policy Postmodernism (all-pain, no-gain for feel-good elitism)

By Tom Tanton -- October 4, 2012

“There is a vast difference between doing the right thing and doing the thing right. In this case, CARB is implementing AB32 in ways that ignore current realities and that likely make matters worse…. It is time for a major reset of the underlying law and its regulatory implementation.” – T. Tanton

The California Air Resources Board (CARB) is all-in, damn-the-torpedoes relating to AB 32, the state’s 2006 anti-global warming law, even while acknowledging that it will drive up the cost of energy. CARB chair Mary Nichols confirmed the start of a statewide cap-and-trade auction system November 14 under which industrial firms will buy and sell emission rights for pollutants–despite receiving unrebutted testimony from manufacturers and business owners about the very onerous, and even devastating, impact of moving forward with the auction.

Continue Reading

Negative Prices and the High Price of Windpower (AWEA's distorting product)

By -- October 3, 2012

This month, unity was shattered within the wind industry when energy-giant Exelon Corporation broke ranks with other renewable-energy developers and asked Congress to let the production tax credit (PTC) expire in December. Exelon rightfully argued that the subsidy was distorting competitive wholesale energy markets and causing financial harm to other, more reliable clean energy sources.

In a fit of fury, the American Wind Energy Association (AWEA) voted Exelon “off the island” for insubordination and dismissed their complaint as self-serving, aimed at protecting Exelon’s fleet of Midwest nuclear power plants. AWEA insisted that wind was benefiting ratepayers by driving down consumer electricity prices in the face of “expensive, inflexible generation” like nuclear and coal.

As usual, AWEA position is easily rebutted. Yes, Exelon is concerned about (bizarre) wind pricing on the rates received by its nuclear power plants.

Continue Reading

Mandatory Open Access: Subsidizing Special Interests

By Jim Clarkson -- October 2, 2012

Traditional public-utility regulation of interstate transmission of both natural gas and electricity has given way to the open-access era. Rather than a bundled product (transportation and the commodity) delivered at one price, the utility just charges for transmission. Third parties (independent marketers) buy and sell  the “unbundled” (gas or electricity) commodity.

Is third-party access (TPA) a step toward free markets compared to what came before? Some say “yes” given that there is a new market with the commodity where, as if led by an invisible hand, a plethora of new pricing terms and services have emerged. This is what led Ken Lay to think of open-access-dependent Enron as a pro-market, pro-competition company. “I believe in God, and I believe in free markets,” he used to say. But Enron was just the opposite, one of the most rent-seeking firms in the history of capitalism.

Continue Reading

Presidential Debate: Climate Change Cheat Sheet

By Chip Knappenberger -- October 1, 2012
Continue Reading

Challenging Bill McKibben and the Green Establishment: The Environmental Case for Fossil Fuels

By -- September 28, 2012
Continue Reading

Wind Consequences (Part V – Other Considerations and Conclusions)

By Kent Hawkins -- September 27, 2012
Continue Reading

Electric Car Verdict: Another Government-Subsidized Bust

By Robert Bradley Jr. -- September 26, 2012
Continue Reading

Wind Consequences (Part IV – Subsidies and Emissions)

By Kent Hawkins -- September 25, 2012
Continue Reading

Unloading Hansen's 'Climate Dice'

By Chip Knappenberger -- September 24, 2012
Continue Reading

"Silent Spring at 50: The False Crises of Rachel Carson" (Reassessing environmentalism's fateful turn from science to advocacy)

By Roger Meiners -- September 21, 2012
Continue Reading