“In Georgia and South Carolina, for example, the nuclear-related cost overruns are a good thing. Not only is rate base enlarged for assigned profits for decades, the CEOs can tell victimized consumers that they are avoiding emissions from much cheaper, cost-predictable conventional power plants. Bootleggers and Baptists all in one.”
Public utility regulation attempts to protect the public where one and only one franchised monopolist serves a certain geographical area. Such is the case with your local natural gas and electricity provider. But the alleged protection is actually the enemy of consumers on close inspection. To understand why, the fundamentals of rate base regulation must be explained.
The Formula
Regulated utilities are allowed to recover their cost to do business and earn a return on invested capital. Expressed as a formula this is the revenue requirement: R = Oc + (V-D)rr
where:
R = Revenue justified by cost and return
Oc = Operating cost including depreciation
V = Value, always first costs
D = Depreciation
rr = Rate of return allowed by regulators
(V-D) = Rate base, this is the current book value of assets and the un-recovered part of depreciable assets and other amortized capital.…
Continue Reading“Pauses as long as 15 years are rare in the simulations, and ‘we expect that [real-world] warming will resume in the next few years,’ the Hadley Centre group writes…. Researchers … agree that no sort of natural variability can hold off greenhouse warming much longer.”
– Richard Kerr. What Happened to Global Warming? Scientists Say Just Wait a Bit.” Science, October 1, 2009.
Debates over the ‘pause’ or ‘hiatus’ of global warming since its El Nino-driven peak back in 1998 should not forget the false confidence of leading alarmist scientists were saying less than a decade ago about how the warming slowdown was surely coming to an end. After all, model-predicted warming was the best indication of reality if the models had the right physics in them (a Big if).…
Continue Reading“By focusing strictly on cost-competitiveness, grid parity fails to consider how dispatchability influences an energy source’s value on the grid. Moreover, renewable energy sources rely heavily on government funding to even reach cost-competitiveness. Continued subsidization of solar and wind to make them cost-competitive or accelerate their adoption is unjustified. “
As Part I of this analysis explained, grid parity for renewable energy is an empty concept because it fails to consider the functionality of renewable resources on the electric grid. Since grid operators must balance supply and demand to sustain grid stability and meet the power needs of Americans, dispatchable resources are extraordinarily valuable for electricity generation.
Resources such as coal, natural gas, nuclear, and hydropower can dispatch power on demand, but solar and wind energy are intermittent, making them undependable for electricity generation.…
Continue Reading