A Free-Market Energy Blog

Rooftop Solar Fraud: The Damage Continues (Part I)

By Robert Bradley Jr. -- February 25, 2026

“[Radiant Solar] was able to [rip off homeowners] in part because home solar energy systems are complicated, expensive things — they often cost around $50,000 — typically involving layers of financing and tax incentives that leave many consumers confused.” 

The rooftop solar industry might be in freefall and on the way out, but the damage of bad performance and long-term contracts endures. The New York Times article, “New York Sues Solar Panel Firm, Saying It Bilked Hundreds of Customers” (January 29, 2026), explains how the city’s Department of Consumer and Worker Protection is seeking almost $20 million in restitution and penalties from ‘home improvement contractor’ Radiant Solar.

In all, “300 victims of the same company, Radiant Solar, which left a trail of damaged homes, large debts and broken promises across the city,” the article reported.…

Continue Reading

Solar Industry Searches for a Message (it is not economics)

By David Bergeron -- February 24, 2026

“But messaging isn’t the problem. The economics, the numbers, are. If solar is truly affordable, reliable, and resilient, the suppliers should say so plainly: in cents per kWh, free of explicit subsidies and mandates.” – David Bergeron, SunDanzer (below)

I just returned from the Intersolar & Energy Storage North America conference in San Diego where the keynote address focused on how the long-duration storage industry can move forward under the headwinds of the current administration. Their strategy? Better messaging, shifting from climate-change arguments to affordability, reliability, and resilience.

But messaging isn’t the problem. The economics, the numbers, are. If solar is truly affordable, reliable, and resilient, the suppliers should say so plainly: in cents per kWh, free of explicit subsidies and mandates.

Cost and reliability have always been the problem with solar.…

Continue Reading

Exchange with Lisa Friedman (NYT) on Climate Alarmist Reporting

By Robert Bradley Jr. -- February 23, 2026

“I will not be bullied but will make my case for objective reporting with the above data point of Seth Borenstein’s article.” (below)

Seth Borenstein posted on LinkedIn:

Scientists in thousands of peer reviewed studies detail, calculate the public health threats, deaths and illnesses from climate change. President Trump calls it all a scam. A detailed look at what the studies and scientists say about the research. The three experts quoted are both MDs and have extra degrees and are professors of public health.

Borenstein was referring to his piece, “Scientific studies calculate climate change as health danger, while Trump calls it a ‘scam’” (AP: February 12, 2026). Read the article, which blows itself up at the end with his recognition that

The issue gets complicated when cold-related deaths are factored in.

Continue Reading

Wind, Solar, and the Great Texas Blackout: Guilty as Charged

By Robert Bradley Jr. -- February 20, 2026
Continue Reading

The Great Texas Blackout Revisited: Market Failure Not

By Robert Bradley Jr. -- February 19, 2026
Continue Reading

Texas Windpower: Will Negative Pricing Blow Out the Lights? (PTC vs. reliable new capacity)

By Josiah Neeley -- February 18, 2026
Continue Reading

The Great Texas Blackout: Storm Uri 2021

By Robert Bradley Jr. -- February 17, 2026
Continue Reading

Energy & Environmental Review: February 16, 2026

By -- February 16, 2026
Continue Reading

Dumbing Energy Down: Interruptible Power as Social Policy

By Robert Bradley Jr. -- February 12, 2026
Continue Reading

Climate Doomism Under Predicted?

By Robert Bradley Jr. -- February 11, 2026
Continue Reading