A free-market energy blog
Random header image... Refresh for more!

The Not Given State of the Union Address (Freedom 101 over ‘the road to serfdom’)

[Last night, President Obama did not deviate from his interventionist, centralist approach to governing America, including with energy policy. This post reverses the mindset to a speech with a free-market, classical-liberal President at the podium.]

“My fellow Americans, I come before you tonight to deliver my sixth State of the Union address at a time of continuing economic disappointment and social uncertainty across our great nation.

“I have spoken to you more than once about the country’s need for ‘hope and change.’ I have tried to begin that process over the first five years of my presidency. But I now realize that I had been looking in the wrong direction for that new and better America.

“Not long ago, while looking under my bed in the White House for the terrorists that the NSA assures me are everywhere and against whom they must surveillance each and every one of you to keep you safe, I found some books that must have been left there by former President Ronald Reagan.

“They included F. A. Hayek’s The Road to Serfdom; Henry Hazlitt’s Economics in One Lesson; Milton Friedman’s Free to Choose; Ayn Rand’s Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal; Julian Simon’s The Ultimate Resource; plus a pamphlet reprint of a chapter from a book by Herbert Spencer called ‘The Right to Ignore the State.’

“For some reason, none of these works were assigned or recommended to me by my ‘progressive’ university professors or socialist mentors.

“I took these books with me on my recent vacation to Hawaii, and read them in between by rounds of golf. They have opened my eyes to an understanding that ‘hope and change’ can come for that better America, but not through government control and dependency.

The Free Individual and His Creative Mind

“I was wrong when I said not too long ago that the man who owns a business did not ‘make it.’ I assumed that improvements in the human condition only result for the actions of the ‘collective,’ as if the ‘collective’ was a living, breathing, thinking being, separate from the individuals who make up the society.

“I now understand and appreciate from reading Ayn Rand that ‘society’ is merely a sometimes convenient, but often confusing, shorthand for the resulting outcomes of the interactions and associative actions and activities of individual human beings. There is no ‘society’ independent from the thinking, valuing and acting individuals in the world.

“And, furthermore, if anything is built its possibility can and only does begin as a creative thought and idea in the mind of a real distinct individual man or woman. The ‘idea’ must precede the ‘deed,’ and the idea only can come from an individual human mind. There is no collective brain.”

[On both sides of the aisle in the Congress, Democrats and Republicans look confused and wonder if Obama has been smoking pot again, because this level of conceptualization is too difficult for the ordinary politician’s concrete-bound vote-getting policy thinking to grasp and understand.]

“My fellow Americans, you do not exist to live and work for ‘society.’ You have a right to your own life, to live it as you think right and best for yourself, through peaceful, honest, and productive work. The achievements of ‘society’ are the outcome of voluntary and mutually beneficial exchanges and associations among free men.

“Our Founding Fathers understood this when they signed the Declaration of Independence and promulgated the U.S. Constitution. Man and his rights precede government, and government’s role in society is not to control or direct the actions of men, but to secure and protect their individual rights to life, liberty, and honestly acquired property.”

[Nancy Pelosi text messages her staff to find out if aliens might have abducted Obama, and transported him somewhere over the Christmas holiday to brainwash him with “tea party” propaganda.]

Freedom and Knowledge

“Starting tomorrow, I am instructing Treasury Secretary Jack Lew to prepare a set of budget proposals, the goal of which will be a balanced budget before the end of the current fiscal year. And not through raising taxes, but through across-the-board cuts in government spending.”

[Jack Lew looks down as his two hands and counts the fingers on each one, since this is the first time since entering government service that he has ever heard that the two sides of the government’s accounting ledger book is supposed to balance.]

“If we are to restore a thriving and fully employed economy in America it will require getting resources out of the wasteful hands of government, and back under the control and guidance of the private and productive citizens whose work, saving, investment, and creativity is the only basis and source of our improving standard of living.

“I now understand that economic growth and opportunity only come from freeing the minds of every American so all may benefit from what others may know. I have learned from F. A. Hayek, that it has been a great arrogance on my part and practically everyone else in government for a very long time to believe that we can know enough to direct and plan the actions of multitudes of people in an ever-more complex society.

“All the knowledge of how, where, and when to do things that make ‘society’ work and creatively improve cannot be known by any one person or group of people in Washington, D.C. The ‘knowledge of the world’ is dispersed and decentralized among all the minds of all the people in society. We must appreciate that the free market is not only a market place of goods, but of ideas that result in the producing of those goods.

“Government regulations, restrictions, prohibitions, subsidies, and plans get in the way of the competitive process that is a great vehicle of ‘discovery’ to find out who, in fact, can creatively imagine and bring to market the new and better products, in greater quantities and lower prices that benefit all in society – especially the poor and less well-off who, year-after-year, gain from more and less expensive goods available and within their modest economic reach.

“It has been a great ‘pretense of knowledge’ on my part to presume that I, as president of the United States, can know who might ‘win’ the market ‘race’ of competitive improvement and excellence before allowing the process of market competitive to serve as the motive and incentive for people to discover within themselves what they are capable of doing and producing.”

[The cell phones of every Senator and Congressman begins to vibrate with calls and text messages from the lobbyists and special interest groups who feed at the trough of government favors and privilege, as they suddenly realize that if Obama means what he is saying, then all the anti-competitive protections, regulations, subsidies, and restrictions they benefit from at the expense of the consumers and potential competitors will be gone.]

Unintended Consequences and the Minimum Wage

“I know that many who have supported me over the years will be wondering how I could turn my back on all those who have looked to me as the great hope for ‘social justice’ and ‘fairness’ in society. Do I no longer care about the poor, the underprivileged, and the needy?

“I now understand after reading Henry Hazlitt that much that seems to be helpful government policy in the short-run can have longer run negative consequences for many of the very people we sincerely wish to help. We must look beyond what is immediately ‘seen’ to what is ‘unseen’: the impact of these policies when we look past today to see the effects they will have tomorrow.

“For that reason, rather than calling for an increase in the government-mandated minimum wage, I will be proposing to the Congress the abolition of the federal minimum wage law. I also will be highly recommending that the various state governments should abolish their minimum wage statutes, as well.

“None of us pays more for anything than we think it is worth, in terms of its value to us and what we can afford to spend. And if something goes up in price, we often think twice before we continue to buy as much of it as we have in the past. We ask ourselves, ‘Is it really worth that higher price, and is it worth buying less of other things to keep buying as much of it as we’ve bought before, because the extra expense to purchase the same amount will have to come out of buying less of something else, since our limited financial means only go so far?’

“The only source of an employer’s financial means to pay his workers their wages is the revenues he receives from the customers who buy his product. If the government mandates that he must pay his workers a minimum wage above the market wage, he will have to decide if the value of what some of those workers contribute to make those products that help him earn that consumer revenue is now less that what the government says he must pay them. If he finds that some of them are not worth the minimum wage he will let them go, and other new jobs that he might have offered will not be financially worth opening up.

“Thus, many of the very people – the poor and low-skilled – who can most benefit from an entry level job that offers them on-the-job training, experience and a chance to have their feet on the first rung of the ladder to a better life, will be denied that opportunity because the government minimum wage law prices them out of the market.

“I sincerely care too much about those people to leave them possibly permanently behind due to such a misguided and counter-productive policy as our minimum wage law.”

[Labor union lobbyists start text messaging their closest allies in Congress that if they expect campaign contributions to be flowing their way in this year’s Congressional elections, they better do all in their power to prevent Obama from passing any repeal of the minimum wage law.]

Free Markets and Real Opportunity

“We must appreciate, as reading Milton Friedman has taught me, that the free competitive market is the ‘great leveler’ that frees people from the artificial barriers to entry and opportunity that only government controls and regulations can place in the way of the poor and less well off rising out of poverty and low standards of living.

“A free society of free people will always be a society of unequal outcomes. Each of us is a unique and distinct individual from the rest of humanity. That is the reason we should respect each individual’s right to his own life and liberty, since he or she is ‘one of a kind,’ never to be seen again on the face of this planet. We should respect and value them, and not presume to tell them how that should live their only sojourn on this earth. Their life is too precious, if indeed we value ‘the person,’ as we say we do, to make them a slave to how we think they should live.

“But because we all possess degrees of uniqueness in our inborn differences, our inclinations and desires, and our drive and determinations to set and try to achieve goals in our life, the resulting outcomes will be different in various ways from that of others.

“It is also the case that how we find ways and decide to earn a living is valued differently by our fellow men. Thus, how much we may earn in the market place is to a great extent a result of by how much our fellow human beings value the services we can offer them in exchange for what we wish to buy from them in the arena of free, competitive trade.

Freedom and Benevolence

“Does that mean that those who are less well off than ourselves may not need and deserve a ‘helping hand’? All people of goodwill and benevolence might rightly have a sense of assisting those who they think deserve and may benefit from such support.

“But such goodwill and benevolence cannot be forced or made either ‘moral’ or ‘right’ by compelling a false philanthropy through government coerced redistribution of wealth. It not only undermines a proper and rightly human sense of concern for one’s fellow men, but leads to many wasteful and misdirected uses and abuses of the taxpayer’s hard earned money.

“For this reason, I will be proposing over the remaining three years of my presidency for the repeal of the Department of Health and Human Resources, as well as the Departments of Education, Housing and Urban Development, Labor, Commerce, Transportation, Energy, and Agriculture.”

[Cell phone companies experience a collapse of their services in the Washington, D.C. area as the there is an overload of calls to members of Congress from every corner of the United States, as tens of thousands of special interest groups go into panic mode with the realization that Obama is proposing the end to every redistributive handout they have been living off for as long as their respective members can remember.]

Free Markets for Better Health Care

“This now gets me, my fellow Americans, to the hardest policy decision I am going to propose to Congress in the current session. I came into office with the hope and dream of assuring affordable health care to each and every American. I even took pride when by opponents began to call the Affordable Care Act, ‘ObamaCare.’

“I call upon the Congress to immediately repeal the Affordable Care Act. Everything that I have now learned from reading Hayek, Hazlitt, Friedman and Rand has taught me that turning over the health care industry and medical services to the regulatory and planning control of the government will lead to nothing but disaster for the nation.

“We do need better health care, at more affordable rates and prices, with improved coverage. But that can only come by freeing those creative minds of the market place in a setting of the most open competition as is possible. We must set loose the same competitive discovery process that has given all those other innovative miracles of more, better, and less expensive goods and services over the years and decades.

“Deregulation of the medical profession and deregulation of the health insurance industry must be our new policy. Individuals should be free to decide and choose their own health plans and trade-offs, and the unrestrained profit motive must be taken advantage to incentivize the offering of health insurance coverage and medical care quality improvements.”

[Every “progressive’ interest group in the country starts releasing quickly written up press releases to the media, even before Obama has finished his address, calling for his impeachment for unethical behavior, because surely the only reason he would make such an about-face with his “legacy legislation” would be if greedy, money-lusting and powerful “right-wing” business interests had bribed him with millions of dollars hidden away in secret bank accounts in the Cayman Islands or Switzerland. Some even refer to him as that black “white” president who has no sensitivity for the problems of the racially and ethically underprivileged.]

Freedom for Sustainable Energy

“Energy has been called the resource of resources, the master resource. Human ingenuity, the ultimate resource, is finding more carbon-based energies than we ever thought possible, and pollution has declined as energy usage has increased. Fossil fuels, in other words, have become more sustainable, not less.

“Climate change from man-made greenhouse emissions once concerned me very much. But data rules in the physical sciences, and global warming stopped 15 or more years ago. Hurricanes and other disasters thought to result from fossil-fuel burning have declined, not increased. I am left to conclude that carbon dioxide is not a pollutant, and the net effect of the human influence on climate is positive, not negative.

“The Keystone XL Pipeline from Canada to the U.S. deserves to get the federal okay to further integrate the North American energy market. Oil and gas development on federal lands should proceed apace to keep up with the private sector, and privatization (de-socialism) of  mineral rights and the title to the land itself should be on my new agenda.

“And my all-of-the-above energy policy? That deserves a demotion. How about all ‘of the market-chosen energies’, with energy losers being stripped of their special subsidies and preferences. Fair field, no favor, should be a cornerstone of public policies toward energy.

The Right to Ignore the State

“My fellow Americans, in closing let me just say that what Herbert Spencer has taught me is that as long as any one of you lives your life peacefully and honestly in your own affairs and in your social and market dealings with others, the government has no moral right to make any claim upon you.

“In other words, you have a ‘right to ignore the state,’ other than when it goes about its proper and limited business in securing and protecting the rights of each and every citizen from the violent and plundering acts of others.

“This is the real and only reasonable agenda for ‘hope and change’ that can bring our country freedom, prosperity, and goodwill among all of our people.

“There is, of course, much more than we should do and can do to bring about that change for the better. That is why between now and my next State of the Union address in a year’s time, I will be putting together proposals to repeal the powers of the NSA, bring all our troops home from around the world, and call upon the Congress to abolish the Federal Reserve System so we can move to a private, competitive banking system with honest money.”

[Janet Yellen text messages the academic dean at UC Berkeley that she may need her professor’s job back for the fall semester of 2015.]

“But I think this agenda for freedom based on individual liberty, free markets and limited government that I have presented this evening is a good start to return to the wonderful vision that our Founding Fathers hoped for when they established our great nation.

“Thank you, my fellow Americans, and God Bless America.”

1 comment

1 John Shepard { 01.29.14 at 1:39 am }

One day.

Leave a Comment