A free-market energy blog
Random header image... Refresh for more!

Global Warming Means More Big New York City Snowstorms? Not So Fast!

New Yorkers are digging out from another major snowfall. The 10 inches or so they got on Wednesday came less than 3 weeks after some 20 inches fell the day after Christmas.

And, odd as it may seem, some folks are linking big snows and big cold in the Big Apple to anthropogenic global warming.

But, a look back through more than 140 years of weather observations from New York’s Central Park shows little evidence to support such a contention.

On December 25, 2010, as New York City was about to be buried under almost 2 feet of snow, the New York Times ran an op-ed by Judah Cohen, a long-range forecaster for the private forecasting firm Atmospheric and Environmental Research, explaining his ideas on how big snowstorms in the Northeastern U.S. were being driven by global warming—specifically, the melting of the Arctic sea ice.

Cohen closed his editorial “Bundle Up: It’s Global Warming” with the following quote:

“It’s all a snow job by nature. The reality is, we’re freezing not in spite of climate change but because of it.”

In my opinion, if there’s a snow job going on, it is being served up by Cohen.

In fact, Cohen’s op-ed is just the latest in long line of articles that appear in major press outlets after a big snowstorm and/or cold outbreak that are intent on fingering global warming as the cause. Sharon Begley’s cover article in Newsweek back in January 1996 titled “The Hot Zone—Blizzards, Floods & Hurricanes: Blame Global Warming” following a crippling 18-inch snowstorm in Washington D.C. is perhaps the most famous example.

But let’s not forget that whenever there is an unseasonably warm spell in the middle of winter in the Northeast or lack of snow there, that, too, is followed by the major press outlets running stories of global warming.

Witness this gem, also from the New York Times, from January 15, 2000, published during a rather warm and snow-free period, and in which Environmental Defense Fund’s Michael Oppenheimer opines:

”I bought a sled in ’96 for my daughter,” said Dr. Michael Oppenheimer, a scientist at the nonprofit Environmental Defense Fund. ”It’s been sitting in the stairwell, and hasn’t been used. I used to go sledding all the time. It’s one of my most vivid and pleasant memories as a kid, hauling the sled out to Cunningham Park in Queens.”

…Dr. Oppenheimer, among other ecologists, points to global warming as perhaps the most significant long-term factor.

The Times apparently likes to have all its bases covered. Perhaps it ought to facilitate a meeting between Oppenheimer and Cohen to sit down together and sort things out. After all, one of them has to be right. Right?

Let’s head to the Halls of Data to see what we can find out for ourselves.

In this case, we find is a treasure trove of weather data collected in New York’s Central Park that includes not only temperature observations but snowfall records that dates back into the 1870s and is freely and readily available from the New York City National Weather Service Office webpage .

If global warming is leading to more or less snowfall in New York City to such a magnitude that it is making headlines, it ought to be plainly obvious in the 141 year record that we have available.

In Figure 1, I plot the total seasonal snowfall observed in Central Park, from the winters of 1869-70 through 2009-10.

Figure 1. Total seasonal snowfall record in New York’s Central Park from the winters of 1869-70 through 2009-10 (light blue points). The 10-yr trailing moving average is indicated by the thick dark blue curve and the overall trend is indicated by the black line (data source: National Weather Service)

So there you have it!

Wait, which is it? Global warming is causing more snowfall in NYC or less?

The overall trend is a statistically significant decline in winter snowfall that totals to about 25% from the 1870s to now. But, the 10-yr running means shows that the low point was reached in about the late 1980s and that the decadally-averaged snowfall totals have increased by about 50% since then (to a level currently that is slightly more than the average over the entire period).

This doesn’t help much in answering our question.

So let’s explore the possible mechanisms.

Judah Cohen argues in his Times op-ed that the decline in late summer Arctic sea ice during the past couple of decades is leading to a greater moisture availability (from the open ocean) to fuel early fall snowfall across Siberia. And that more early snowfall across Siberia helps to build up a mass of cold air over the snow cover and that this mass of cold air diverts the atmospheric jet stream away from a low amplitude pattern and towards a pattern characterized by high amplitude standing waves with a preference for an atmospheric trough (which leads to cold outbreaks and active weather) in the eastern U.S. Voila! More winter snow in New York City from less summer sea ice as a result of global warming.

While this seems to have an air of reason to it, problems emerge when looking for this signal in the data. Figure 2 shows the summer time ice history in the Arctic since 1900 as put together by the Polar Research Group of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Granted, there isn’t a whole lot of data to go on prior to the satellite coverage which begins in the late 1970s, but nevertheless, there was probably more ice coverage during the summers in the early part of the 20th century than there is during the summers now (which would mean less NYC snowfall then via Cohen’s mechanism).

Figure 2. History of Arctic sea ice coverage. Summer values are indicated by the green triangles (source: Cryosphere Today).

Comparing the Arctic summer ice extent history (green triangles in Figure 2) with the Central Park snowfall history (from Figure 1) shows little that would make you think that less summer sea ice leads to more NYC snowfall—in fact, the general shape of the two graphs (both showing long-term declines) suggests a positive correlation rather than the negative one forwarded by Cohen. This is not to say that conditions in Siberia do not in some instances influence the weather over the eastern U.S., just that the influence is not really bankable (see here for more discussion about this).

Another possible mechanism influencing NYC snow totals is a more general one—higher temperatures lead to less snowfall.

This can be seen in Figure 3, in which I plot the average winter (DJF) temperature in Central Park vs. total seasonal snowfall. Notice a pretty strong negative relationship—the warmer it is during the winter, generally the less snow accumulates in Central Park.

Figure 3. The relationship between average winter (December-February) temperature and total seasonal snowfall in Central Park (data source: National Weather Service).

And finally, I plot the winter temperature history in Central Park since 1870, which shows that winters have been getting warming there (Figure 4), which, based on the relationship in Figure 3, should exert a pressure for less total snowfall.

Figure 4. Average winter (DJF) temperature observed in New York’s Central Park from the winters of 1869-70 through 2009-2010 (light blue points). The10-yr trailing moving average is indicated by the thick dark blue curve and the overall trend is indicated by the black line (data source: National Weather Service).

Now whether or not Central Park’s winter temperature history reflects anthropogenic “global warming,” naturally variable regional circulation changes, or local city growth, I’ll leave up to your own views (for what it’s worth, I think it probably reflects a bit of all three).

But, do note, that even though warmer winters lead to less snowfall, and overall winters have been warming, that the snowfall history of Central Park shows that big snows and big winter snowfall totals still do happen, and do so with some frequency—big snows are hardly a thing of the past.

So, the way I see it, it is premature to lay the blame on global warming when bemoaning the lack of snowfall in NYC in any particular year (like Oppenheimer was keen on a decade ago) and it is a bit silly to blame global warming for the (relative) plethora of big snows in recent years (like Cohen is want to do).

Which leaves natural variability as the primary driver of just how white New York City’s winters are.

I wonder how that would play as a New York Times op-ed?

New York Winters: Blizzardous or Bland, C’est la Vie!


1 Sean { 01.13.11 at 4:07 am }

Let Mr. Cohen have his fun. He may think he’s making a point but the average guy shoveling snow in the cold and struggling to get to work is incapable of the mental gymnastics to come up with such a rationalization. In the end, Mr. Cohen is undermining his cause in the eyes of the general public.

2 Andrew { 01.13.11 at 8:52 am }

Even theoretically Cohen’s proposal is nonsensical, as far as I can tell. Since there is melted ice more water is around to fall as snow…what?

But nice job with the data, which shows that even if it did seem plausible, it’s likely not going on. The North-Hemisphere snow data from satellites also doesn’t seem to support a positive effect, and any negative impact is, much like in NYC, lost in the noise on year to year timescales. It is there though:


3 Donna Laframboise { 01.13.11 at 10:07 am }

You may be interested in the Jan/Feb 2008 cover story from The Environmental Magazine titled: “Losing Winter: As Climate Change Takes Hold, Our Coldest Season is the First Casualty”.

It was accompanied by sidebars titled: “SOS: Save Our Snow” and “Back When Its Snowed.”

See this blog post:


4 cknappenberger { 01.13.11 at 12:27 pm }

For those interested, the Science & Public Policy Institute just last week published an analysis of the history of snowfall in Philadelphia that reached the same basic conclusions as my analysis of New York City snows–warming leads to less snowfall, not vice versa.

For details, see the SPPI report by Dr. Richard Keen:

Are Huge Northeast Snow Storms Due to Global Warming?


5 Jon Boone { 01.13.11 at 12:31 pm }

Great post, Donna. Thanks. Loved the quote from 1984, which could have been the lead-in for Chip’s fine piece here.

6 David Pinto { 01.13.11 at 12:55 pm }

There were two fairly large volcanic eruptions in the last year, Iceland and Indonesia. It seems whenever there is a big eruption, we get more snow.

7 Charles { 01.13.11 at 11:42 pm }

The comments by Cohen are symptomatic of a much more widespread process going on at the moment where the climate catastrophists now ascribe almost any weather event to Global Warming.

This ultimately cheapens their argument, and puts on display what most people recognise quickly as a complete lack of integrity.

I say we should let them have enough rope to hang themselves, as they are doing a much better job of destroying their own arguments than I could ever do. That way we might be able to rid ourselves of these zealots for decades rather than just a few years.

8 Democrats try to stop inquiry into Climategate [Reader Post] | Flopping Aces { 01.21.11 at 1:27 pm }

[...] now we are told that global warming causes both more snow and less snow, at least in New York [...]

9 The truth about electric cars | Piedmont Publius { 01.31.11 at 8:21 am }

[...] do too good in the cold and snow. And we’re going to have a lot more of that, at least if you believe the global warming guys. [...]

10 Richard Keen { 02.03.11 at 3:34 am }

”I bought a sled in ‘96 for my daughter,” said Dr. Michael Oppenheimer, a scientist at the nonprofit Environmental Defense Fund. ”It’s been sitting in the stairwell, and hasn’t been used. I used to go sledding all the time. It’s one of my most vivid and pleasant memories as a kid, hauling the sled out to Cunningham Park in Queens.”

Hey, I got a sled as a kid in Philadelphia in 1950. Look at my graph (linked by Chip in comment #4) and you’ll see why I wasn’t able to use the sled for three years. So the sled sat in the garage and got rusty runners. So Oppie’s daughter’s tragic encounter with climate change has occurred to previous generations.
My kids had much more use of their sleds than I did.
Thanks, Chip, for doing the same calculation for Central Park, and with the same result as for Philadelphia.

11 Mark Barter { 04.23.11 at 12:51 am }

I wouldn’t trust Cohen. One of the things he states in his explanation is that the extra snow coverage is causing the sun to reflect its heat back out to space. Hmmm isn’t that what this is all about, carbon preventing the heat from radiating back into space. If he is right, then he has just proved the greenhouse effect is a lie and that AGW is a fairytale. He just shot himself in the foot I think hahahaha

Leave a Comment