“Speculative incremental harm from a multi-decade global phenomenon has a classical liberal option: civil society charity. Uber-wealthy climate-related foundations can evaluate the harms to poor island villagers from sea level rise (as an example). But keep politicized science, global judicial activism, and backdoor Big Brother out of it.” By 2004, after Jonathan Adler reversed positions … Continue reading “Global Warming: A Dialogue” (Adler’s Judicial Activism Considered)