<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wind Integration Realities: The Netherlands Study (Part II)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.masterresource.org/2010/05/wind-integration-realities-netherlands-i/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.masterresource.org/2010/05/wind-integration-realities-netherlands-i/</link>
	<description>A free-market energy blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 20:41:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: KHawkins</title>
		<link>http://www.masterresource.org/2010/05/wind-integration-realities-netherlands-i/comment-page-1/#comment-13306</link>
		<dc:creator>KHawkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Sep 2010 18:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.masterresource.org/?p=9985#comment-13306</guid>
		<description>A correction to the text has been made. The formula from the Netherlands study for &#916;R is valid at the point that the fossil fuel savings become zero (&#916;F=0).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A correction to the text has been made. The formula from the Netherlands study for &Delta;R is valid at the point that the fossil fuel savings become zero (&Delta;F=0).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Boone</title>
		<link>http://www.masterresource.org/2010/05/wind-integration-realities-netherlands-i/comment-page-1/#comment-10504</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Boone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 14:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.masterresource.org/?p=9985#comment-10504</guid>
		<description>Nice work, Kent. Thanks for clarifying the way that Le Pair/De Groot calculated gross efficiency losses/heat rate penalties across the range of Dutch thermal generators. Rather ingenuous methodology. Given the nature of the problem, it seems reasonable that, when all of the Dutch thermal plants are properly accounted for, the Dutch results will become more refined, in the process becoming more congruent with your calculations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice work, Kent. Thanks for clarifying the way that Le Pair/De Groot calculated gross efficiency losses/heat rate penalties across the range of Dutch thermal generators. Rather ingenuous methodology. Given the nature of the problem, it seems reasonable that, when all of the Dutch thermal plants are properly accounted for, the Dutch results will become more refined, in the process becoming more congruent with your calculations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

