<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Population, Consumption, Carbon Emissions, and Human Well-Being in the Age of Industrialization (Part I &#8212; Revisiting the Julian Simon-Paul Ehrlich Bet)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.masterresource.org/2010/04/population-consumption-carbon-emissions-and-human-well-being-in-the-age-of-industrialization-part-i-revisiting-the-julian-simon-paul-ehrlich-bet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.masterresource.org/2010/04/population-consumption-carbon-emissions-and-human-well-being-in-the-age-of-industrialization-part-i-revisiting-the-julian-simon-paul-ehrlich-bet/</link>
	<description>A free-market energy blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 20:41:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SWARAJ &#187; Why the neo-malthusians are wrong</title>
		<link>http://www.masterresource.org/2010/04/population-consumption-carbon-emissions-and-human-well-being-in-the-age-of-industrialization-part-i-revisiting-the-julian-simon-paul-ehrlich-bet/comment-page-1/#comment-9654</link>
		<dc:creator>SWARAJ &#187; Why the neo-malthusians are wrong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 07:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.masterresource.org/?p=9145#comment-9654</guid>
		<description>[...] those who think that Julian Simon lucked out in his bet against Ehrlich, let Indur Goklany have your ear for a few moments: What is important is not whether metals prices have dropped or [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] those who think that Julian Simon lucked out in his bet against Ehrlich, let Indur Goklany have your ear for a few moments: What is important is not whether metals prices have dropped or [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quo Vadis</title>
		<link>http://www.masterresource.org/2010/04/population-consumption-carbon-emissions-and-human-well-being-in-the-age-of-industrialization-part-i-revisiting-the-julian-simon-paul-ehrlich-bet/comment-page-1/#comment-9636</link>
		<dc:creator>Quo Vadis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 20:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.masterresource.org/?p=9145#comment-9636</guid>
		<description>Words, words words.  Indur Goklany is full of clap trap.

The tragedy of the commons that is currently unfolding in the worlds oceans is not a trend that can be re-interpreted by re-draughting lines on graphs.  The plight of real species such as yellowfin and bluefin tuna attest to the destuctive application of human technology on the natural world.  The deployment of highly efficient resource extraction to the oceans is a prime example of human ingenuity and at the same time attests to the ignorance of mankind to the nature of the world we live in and the inability of the free market to protect the natural world from the predations of capitalism.

Goklany looks only at the small picture.... He lacks any vision as to the broader balances that are disturbed by the explosive burst in human activity of the last 250 years. 12000 years ago, 1,000,000 people lived on this planet.  That many had already had an environmental impact and were in the process of wiping out the mega fauna in all continents with the exception of Africa. 

With the advent of agriculture, humanity exploded in numbers.  with a 70,000% increase on their original numbers over the next 11700 years until the advent of the industrial revolution.  In context, the population explosion between the birth of Christ and entry into the industrial revolution (1750 years) is about 400%.  The population explosion since the advent of the industrial revolution is over 800% (in 260 years).

Indur Goklany is trying to say that this has no down side.  We can go on increasing without any problems?  Bull.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Words, words words.  Indur Goklany is full of clap trap.</p>
<p>The tragedy of the commons that is currently unfolding in the worlds oceans is not a trend that can be re-interpreted by re-draughting lines on graphs.  The plight of real species such as yellowfin and bluefin tuna attest to the destuctive application of human technology on the natural world.  The deployment of highly efficient resource extraction to the oceans is a prime example of human ingenuity and at the same time attests to the ignorance of mankind to the nature of the world we live in and the inability of the free market to protect the natural world from the predations of capitalism.</p>
<p>Goklany looks only at the small picture&#8230;. He lacks any vision as to the broader balances that are disturbed by the explosive burst in human activity of the last 250 years. 12000 years ago, 1,000,000 people lived on this planet.  That many had already had an environmental impact and were in the process of wiping out the mega fauna in all continents with the exception of Africa. </p>
<p>With the advent of agriculture, humanity exploded in numbers.  with a 70,000% increase on their original numbers over the next 11700 years until the advent of the industrial revolution.  In context, the population explosion between the birth of Christ and entry into the industrial revolution (1750 years) is about 400%.  The population explosion since the advent of the industrial revolution is over 800% (in 260 years).</p>
<p>Indur Goklany is trying to say that this has no down side.  We can go on increasing without any problems?  Bull.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Return of the Neo-Malthusians &#124; Think Tank West</title>
		<link>http://www.masterresource.org/2010/04/population-consumption-carbon-emissions-and-human-well-being-in-the-age-of-industrialization-part-i-revisiting-the-julian-simon-paul-ehrlich-bet/comment-page-1/#comment-9586</link>
		<dc:creator>Return of the Neo-Malthusians &#124; Think Tank West</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 12:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.masterresource.org/?p=9145#comment-9586</guid>
		<description>[...] have started a series of posts at Master Resources that compares the above Neo-Malthusian view of industrialization, economic growth, and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have started a series of posts at Master Resources that compares the above Neo-Malthusian view of industrialization, economic growth, and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

