Comments on: Krugman Paints False Picture of Consensus Alarmism

By: Cooler Heads Digest 16 April 2010 | GlobalWarming.org

Cooler Heads Digest 16 April 2010 | GlobalWarming.org — Wed, 28 Apr 2010 14:58:46 +0000

[...] Krugman Wrong on Climate Science Robert Murphy, MasterResource.org, 16 April 2010 [...]

By: Global Warming Hoax Weekly Round-Up, April 22nd 2010 « The Daily Bayonet

Global Warming Hoax Weekly Round-Up, April 22nd 2010 « The Daily Bayonet — Thu, 22 Apr 2010 15:47:41 +0000

[...] winner Paul Krugman is well and truly fisked for his article on building a green [...]

By: major

major — Sat, 17 Apr 2010 05:26:13 +0000

He is the most dangerous form of liar…..he knows how to parse the subtlties of fact to twist reasoning to the wrong conclusions. For what purpose?? For what agenda?? I doubt its overhwelming concern for the environment that motivates the massive global warming scam. In part its money, whats the other part??

By: Deuce

Deuce — Fri, 16 Apr 2010 20:30:24 +0000

Krugman is a worse scientist than he is economist. I don’t care about insignificant nominations for awards from grey organizations supporting or backed by political agendas. Just look at the facts. His economic perspectives have shown to be horrific failures, yet he is out there doubling down on them even as our economy is on the brink of collapse. His assertions about global warming are astoundingly ignorant. He basically claims that Global Warming is real and happening provided you willfully ignore any time the temperature drops and look only at an arbitrary and statistically massaged average. Imagine that. Very much in same vein as his economic theories that are rock solid so long as you cover your eyes and ignore the national debt, shrinking middle class, government deficits, sinking dollar, and an endless string of artificial bubbles in wholly manipulated stock market.

But this is what we get for worshipping demigogues. We love to worship people who we perceive to have qualities we value in ourselves. Krugman presents himself as educated, well spoken, savvy with money and wholly altruistic. Yet, in perhaps mankinds greatest tragic flaw, we never are willing to believe that such a person would be faking it for the money power and devotion it affords them. I view Paul Krugman in a dimmer light that I view the guy that gets my order wrong at McDonalds. Usually the kid at McDonalds is 16, it is his first job and he apologizes when you point out his mistake. Krugman seems to have diarrhea of the mouth about what everyone should be doing with their money and believing about science, and he has been nothing if not wrong. Yet without apology he drones on with faulty predictions about economics and assertions about topics that he doesn’t even begin to comprehend. To the point of being a condescending prick about it. I don’t even know why we single him out as Paul Krugman, rather than another a-hole with more opinions than credibility. And while I’m sure that’s how he would view me, the fact is that doing the exact opposite of everything he has ever suggested has left me better off economically and scientifically than anyone following his best advice. Especially the US government…

By: C3 Editor

C3 Editor — Fri, 16 Apr 2010 13:01:05 +0000

On several occasions (postings) we have taken serious issue with Krugman on his non-expert climate analysis.

Regarding “Paul Krugman is a very smart guy, and has a gift for explaining technical issues in terms that the layperson can understand”, in recognition of this, we have published numerous temperature charts that the layperson can understand and then will probably realize that Krugman is either exaggerating or lying (reader’s choice) about “global warming”:

Modern temperatures: http://tinyurl.com/y3qstow

Historical temperatures: http://tinyurl.com/yynqbpo

Global warming is happening but it is not “unprecedented”, it is not “accelerating”, and it is not “unequivocal.”