<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dear U.S. Chamber of Commerce: Why Attempt to Resuscitate a Brain Dead Climate Bill?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.masterresource.org/2010/01/the-u-s-chamber-of-commerce-why-attempt-to-resuscitate-a-brain-dead-climate-bill/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.masterresource.org/2010/01/the-u-s-chamber-of-commerce-why-attempt-to-resuscitate-a-brain-dead-climate-bill/</link>
	<description>A free-market energy blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 20:41:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Van Schuyver</title>
		<link>http://www.masterresource.org/2010/01/the-u-s-chamber-of-commerce-why-attempt-to-resuscitate-a-brain-dead-climate-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-4211</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Van Schuyver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 04:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.masterresource.org/?p=6965#comment-4211</guid>
		<description>Nice post. Thanks Robert. As you know we are big fans of your work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post. Thanks Robert. As you know we are big fans of your work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://www.masterresource.org/2010/01/the-u-s-chamber-of-commerce-why-attempt-to-resuscitate-a-brain-dead-climate-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-4210</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 23:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.masterresource.org/?p=6965#comment-4210</guid>
		<description>Good stuff Rob to highlight the unsettling new trend in business today, which is to adopt the rent-seeking role to the cost of tax-payers.  All this does is entrench government distortion of markets by allowing large corporations to support government generated market positions by some of these businesses.

I suspect that in the future voters and the public in general is going to have to be a lot better informed about these connivances, as I think they will become more complex and sophisticated in the future and therefore much harder to spot.

Easier to nip in the bud now before it ever gets a life of its own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good stuff Rob to highlight the unsettling new trend in business today, which is to adopt the rent-seeking role to the cost of tax-payers.  All this does is entrench government distortion of markets by allowing large corporations to support government generated market positions by some of these businesses.</p>
<p>I suspect that in the future voters and the public in general is going to have to be a lot better informed about these connivances, as I think they will become more complex and sophisticated in the future and therefore much harder to spot.</p>
<p>Easier to nip in the bud now before it ever gets a life of its own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.masterresource.org/2010/01/the-u-s-chamber-of-commerce-why-attempt-to-resuscitate-a-brain-dead-climate-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-4209</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 23:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.masterresource.org/?p=6965#comment-4209</guid>
		<description>Danni-The problem with your argument is that the climate bills are not efficiency bills, they are emissions reductions bills. Efficiency as so small an impact on emissions (YES even in aggregate) that it is laughable to suggest that they are &quot;good for the environment&quot; in any measurable sense (or bad for that matter). More over, since when has it ever been necessary for businesses to be &lt;i&gt;told&lt;/i&gt; to do something which benefits them, much less families and individuals?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Danni-The problem with your argument is that the climate bills are not efficiency bills, they are emissions reductions bills. Efficiency as so small an impact on emissions (YES even in aggregate) that it is laughable to suggest that they are &#8220;good for the environment&#8221; in any measurable sense (or bad for that matter). More over, since when has it ever been necessary for businesses to be <i>told</i> to do something which benefits them, much less families and individuals?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Bradley Jr.</title>
		<link>http://www.masterresource.org/2010/01/the-u-s-chamber-of-commerce-why-attempt-to-resuscitate-a-brain-dead-climate-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-4208</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Bradley Jr.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 22:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.masterresource.org/?p=6965#comment-4208</guid>
		<description>Consumer-driven energy efficiency is one thing--government-incited or government-mandated conservationism is quite another.

Why not let the market decide?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Consumer-driven energy efficiency is one thing&#8211;government-incited or government-mandated conservationism is quite another.</p>
<p>Why not let the market decide?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danni</title>
		<link>http://www.masterresource.org/2010/01/the-u-s-chamber-of-commerce-why-attempt-to-resuscitate-a-brain-dead-climate-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-4206</link>
		<dc:creator>Danni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 17:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.masterresource.org/?p=6965#comment-4206</guid>
		<description>Because efficiency is good for business, good for the family budget, and good for the environment. http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#/uschamber?ref=ts</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because efficiency is good for business, good for the family budget, and good for the environment. <a href="http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#/uschamber?ref=ts" rel="nofollow">http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#/uschamber?ref=ts</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

