<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EPA&#8217;s Tailoring Rule: Temporary, Dubious, Incomplete Antidote to Massachusetts v. EPA&#8217;s Legacy of Absurd Results (Part 2)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.masterresource.org/2010/01/epas-tailoring-rule-temporary-dubious-incomplete-antidote-to-massachusetts-v-epas-legacy-of-absurd-resuls-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.masterresource.org/2010/01/epas-tailoring-rule-temporary-dubious-incomplete-antidote-to-massachusetts-v-epas-legacy-of-absurd-resuls-part-2/</link>
	<description>A free-market energy blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 20:41:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TCEQ to EPA: Don&#8217;t Mess with Texas&#160;&#124;&#160;OpenMarket.org</title>
		<link>http://www.masterresource.org/2010/01/epas-tailoring-rule-temporary-dubious-incomplete-antidote-to-massachusetts-v-epas-legacy-of-absurd-resuls-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-12478</link>
		<dc:creator>TCEQ to EPA: Don&#8217;t Mess with Texas&#160;&#124;&#160;OpenMarket.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 20:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.masterresource.org/?p=6604#comment-12478</guid>
		<description>[...] the Clean Air Act to greenhouse gases thus produces what EPA itself describes as &#8220;absurd results.&#8221; For example, EPA and its State counterparts would have to process an estimated 41,000 PSD [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the Clean Air Act to greenhouse gases thus produces what EPA itself describes as &#8220;absurd results.&#8221; For example, EPA and its State counterparts would have to process an estimated 41,000 PSD [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rockefeller Bill - Is It Good Enough?&#160;&#124;&#160;OpenMarket.org</title>
		<link>http://www.masterresource.org/2010/01/epas-tailoring-rule-temporary-dubious-incomplete-antidote-to-massachusetts-v-epas-legacy-of-absurd-resuls-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-12205</link>
		<dc:creator>Rockefeller Bill - Is It Good Enough?&#160;&#124;&#160;OpenMarket.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 22:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.masterresource.org/?p=6604#comment-12205</guid>
		<description>[...] must now take sole responsibility for EPA&#8217;s endangerment rule and the ensuing regulatory cascade. Waxman-Markey and most other cap-and-trade bills contained language preempting EPA regulation of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] must now take sole responsibility for EPA&#8217;s endangerment rule and the ensuing regulatory cascade. Waxman-Markey and most other cap-and-trade bills contained language preempting EPA regulation of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stopping the EPA&#8217;s CO2 Regulations &#124; The Foundry: Conservative Policy News.</title>
		<link>http://www.masterresource.org/2010/01/epas-tailoring-rule-temporary-dubious-incomplete-antidote-to-massachusetts-v-epas-legacy-of-absurd-resuls-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-10822</link>
		<dc:creator>Stopping the EPA&#8217;s CO2 Regulations &#124; The Foundry: Conservative Policy News.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 17:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.masterresource.org/?p=6604#comment-10822</guid>
		<description>[...] entities by raising the pollution thresholds in the Clean Air Act. Known as the tailoring rule, the change stands on shaky legal ground – floods of lawsuits are likely to come from environmental groups that believe the EPA should [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] entities by raising the pollution thresholds in the Clean Air Act. Known as the tailoring rule, the change stands on shaky legal ground – floods of lawsuits are likely to come from environmental groups that believe the EPA should [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Did Congress Intend for EPA to Regulate CO2 through the Clean Air Act?&#160;&#124;&#160;OpenMarket.org</title>
		<link>http://www.masterresource.org/2010/01/epas-tailoring-rule-temporary-dubious-incomplete-antidote-to-massachusetts-v-epas-legacy-of-absurd-resuls-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-10701</link>
		<dc:creator>Did Congress Intend for EPA to Regulate CO2 through the Clean Air Act?&#160;&#124;&#160;OpenMarket.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 20:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.masterresource.org/?p=6604#comment-10701</guid>
		<description>[...] the Clean Air Act to carbon dioxide leads to &#8220;absurd results&#8221; &#8212; regulatory consequences that conflict with and undermine congressional intent, as [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the Clean Air Act to carbon dioxide leads to &#8220;absurd results&#8221; &#8212; regulatory consequences that conflict with and undermine congressional intent, as [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Disapproving of EPA’s CO2 Regulations &#124; Conservative Principles Now</title>
		<link>http://www.masterresource.org/2010/01/epas-tailoring-rule-temporary-dubious-incomplete-antidote-to-massachusetts-v-epas-legacy-of-absurd-resuls-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-10530</link>
		<dc:creator>Disapproving of EPA’s CO2 Regulations &#124; Conservative Principles Now</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 19:24:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.masterresource.org/?p=6604#comment-10530</guid>
		<description>[...] Air Act. Known as the tailoring rule, the change not only stands on shaky constitutional ground, it also stands on shaky legal ground – floods of lawsuits are likely to come from environmental groups that believe the EPA should [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Air Act. Known as the tailoring rule, the change not only stands on shaky constitutional ground, it also stands on shaky legal ground – floods of lawsuits are likely to come from environmental groups that believe the EPA should [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Disapproving of EPA’s CO2 Regulations &#124; The Foundry: Conservative Policy News.</title>
		<link>http://www.masterresource.org/2010/01/epas-tailoring-rule-temporary-dubious-incomplete-antidote-to-massachusetts-v-epas-legacy-of-absurd-resuls-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-10509</link>
		<dc:creator>Disapproving of EPA’s CO2 Regulations &#124; The Foundry: Conservative Policy News.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 23:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.masterresource.org/?p=6604#comment-10509</guid>
		<description>[...] Air Act. Known as the tailoring rule, the change not only stands on shaky constitutional ground, it also stands on shaky legal ground – floods of lawsuits are likely to come from environmental groups that believe the EPA should [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Air Act. Known as the tailoring rule, the change not only stands on shaky constitutional ground, it also stands on shaky legal ground – floods of lawsuits are likely to come from environmental groups that believe the EPA should [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Another Oldie But Goodie: Mark Mills 1998 CO2 Compliance Burden Study&#160;&#124;&#160;OpenMarket.org</title>
		<link>http://www.masterresource.org/2010/01/epas-tailoring-rule-temporary-dubious-incomplete-antidote-to-massachusetts-v-epas-legacy-of-absurd-resuls-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-9939</link>
		<dc:creator>Another Oldie But Goodie: Mark Mills 1998 CO2 Compliance Burden Study&#160;&#124;&#160;OpenMarket.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 22:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.masterresource.org/?p=6604#comment-9939</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cooler Heads Digest 15 January 2010&#160;&#124;&#160;GlobalWarming.org</title>
		<link>http://www.masterresource.org/2010/01/epas-tailoring-rule-temporary-dubious-incomplete-antidote-to-massachusetts-v-epas-legacy-of-absurd-resuls-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-4502</link>
		<dc:creator>Cooler Heads Digest 15 January 2010&#160;&#124;&#160;GlobalWarming.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 17:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.masterresource.org/?p=6604#comment-4502</guid>
		<description>[...] will not become final until March. To learn more about this regulatory morass, read posts (here and here) from CEI&#8217;s Marlo [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] will not become final until March. To learn more about this regulatory morass, read posts (here and here) from CEI&#8217;s Marlo [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cooler Heads Digest 8 January 2010&#160;&#124;&#160;GlobalWarming.org</title>
		<link>http://www.masterresource.org/2010/01/epas-tailoring-rule-temporary-dubious-incomplete-antidote-to-massachusetts-v-epas-legacy-of-absurd-resuls-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-4061</link>
		<dc:creator>Cooler Heads Digest 8 January 2010&#160;&#124;&#160;GlobalWarming.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 17:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.masterresource.org/?p=6604#comment-4061</guid>
		<description>[...] EPA&#8217;s Legacy of Absurd Results Marlo Lewis, MasterResource.org, 8 January 2010 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] EPA&#8217;s Legacy of Absurd Results Marlo Lewis, MasterResource.org, 8 January 2010 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: major</title>
		<link>http://www.masterresource.org/2010/01/epas-tailoring-rule-temporary-dubious-incomplete-antidote-to-massachusetts-v-epas-legacy-of-absurd-resuls-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-4050</link>
		<dc:creator>major</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 20:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.masterresource.org/?p=6604#comment-4050</guid>
		<description>Global Warming religion is becoming increasingly dangerous.  Theres evidence that Global Warming is linked with several other extremist environmental groups and many other Socialist organizations.

The GW movement ( I like to refer to it as a bowel movement) is not  interested in a dialog or debate, hence not truth.  It wants to mop up as many weak minded kool aid drinkers as they can to use as a Ghestapo to go against their oponents,  America and Democracy.  

Their current strategy to  avoid admitting or recognizing scientific fact, is to stare straight ahead  and repeat their environmentalist mantra repeatedly and rapidly; continue to demonize legitimate science without engaging in a rational dialogue or interface; set up their own conferences and meetings only inviting true believers, so they can reinforce  their pseudo scientifc belief system.

The number of organizations that have crossed over to never, never land are startling;  NASA, Scientific American, The Weather Channel, Nature, to name a couple.....these, in the paste, were  bastions of science, have now adopted the vacant stare of zombies, and repeat endlessly their mindless monologue.  This indicates to me that they werent converted en masse but were slowly infiltrated by  Gore&#039;s Ghestapo at the leadership level.

This is a war and people need  recognize it as a war, a propaganda war that will soon become a fighting war.  To nullify this invasion of the body snatchers, we need to carry out missions into the enemies camp, we need to infiltrate and gather intel to protect ourselves and our Country from these new nazi&#039;s.  Climategate is the first sign of the intelligence war against global irrationalism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Global Warming religion is becoming increasingly dangerous.  Theres evidence that Global Warming is linked with several other extremist environmental groups and many other Socialist organizations.</p>
<p>The GW movement ( I like to refer to it as a bowel movement) is not  interested in a dialog or debate, hence not truth.  It wants to mop up as many weak minded kool aid drinkers as they can to use as a Ghestapo to go against their oponents,  America and Democracy.  </p>
<p>Their current strategy to  avoid admitting or recognizing scientific fact, is to stare straight ahead  and repeat their environmentalist mantra repeatedly and rapidly; continue to demonize legitimate science without engaging in a rational dialogue or interface; set up their own conferences and meetings only inviting true believers, so they can reinforce  their pseudo scientifc belief system.</p>
<p>The number of organizations that have crossed over to never, never land are startling;  NASA, Scientific American, The Weather Channel, Nature, to name a couple&#8230;..these, in the paste, were  bastions of science, have now adopted the vacant stare of zombies, and repeat endlessly their mindless monologue.  This indicates to me that they werent converted en masse but were slowly infiltrated by  Gore&#8217;s Ghestapo at the leadership level.</p>
<p>This is a war and people need  recognize it as a war, a propaganda war that will soon become a fighting war.  To nullify this invasion of the body snatchers, we need to carry out missions into the enemies camp, we need to infiltrate and gather intel to protect ourselves and our Country from these new nazi&#8217;s.  Climategate is the first sign of the intelligence war against global irrationalism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

