Comments on: Sen. Lindsey Graham's Me-Too Kyotoism (will he snatch defeat from the jaws of victory?)

By: Orson

Orson — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 11:20:25 +0000

I am a bit underwhelmed by this analysis.
Why not simply stick with the scientific fundamentals?
What warming? “Proved” by “adjusting” raw data, then losing it? (Not.)
Is the raw evidence really any different from the pre-ACO2 era? (Not.)
etc.
If the science is so weak, then where do National Security considerations enter? By magic? (etc.)

By: Peter weggeman

Peter weggeman — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 19:14:55 +0000

It is incredible that ominous and imminent man-made global warming due to CO2 emissions is still accepted as indisputable. It is the biggest political hoax ever. This century will mark the end of oil and gas. Oil will start to be constrained by price and supply in the next decade, followed by natural gas. Energy planning for the existing and new ‘renewable’ sources should be based on these depletions. Not on the fear of a false climate crisis. We will look back and laugh again at the ‘madness of crowds’, assuming we still have the luxury of being able to laugh at ourselves.

By: Free-market commentary on the Kerry-Graham cap-and-trade oped | OpenMarket.org

Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:16:33 +0000

[...] Today, on MasterResource.Org, the free-market energy blog, I posted “Sen. Lindsey Graham’s Me-Too Kyotoism (will he snatch defeat from the jaws of victory?)” [...]

By: AS50

AS50 — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:42:37 +0000

“Incoherent model” very aptly describes the cap and trade scheme. This legislation will spell disaster for the US economy, which is already on unstable ground. Make sure your Senators do not support this horrible legislation.