<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Even the Generals are Worried! Mission Creep, Climate Change, and National Security (Part 1)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.masterresource.org/2009/09/even-the-generals-are-worried-can-you-spell-m-i-s-s-i-o-n-c-r-e-e-p-climate-change-and-national-security-part-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.masterresource.org/2009/09/even-the-generals-are-worried-can-you-spell-m-i-s-s-i-o-n-c-r-e-e-p-climate-change-and-national-security-part-1/</link>
	<description>A free-market energy blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:52:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sen. Lindsey Graham&#8217;s Me-Too Kyotoism (will he snatch defeat from the jaws of victory?) &#8212; MasterResource</title>
		<link>http://www.masterresource.org/2009/09/even-the-generals-are-worried-can-you-spell-m-i-s-s-i-o-n-c-r-e-e-p-climate-change-and-national-security-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-2800</link>
		<dc:creator>Sen. Lindsey Graham&#8217;s Me-Too Kyotoism (will he snatch defeat from the jaws of victory?) &#8212; MasterResource</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 06:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masterresource.org/?p=4611#comment-2800</guid>
		<description>[...] our economy and national security.&#8221; The alleged peril is vastly overblown, as I explain here and here. Regulatory climate policies pose  bigger threats to the economy and national security, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] our economy and national security.&#8221; The alleged peril is vastly overblown, as I explain here and here. Regulatory climate policies pose  bigger threats to the economy and national security, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MasterResource Surpasses 200,000 Views; Continues to Attract New Talent (3rd Quarter Report) &#8212; MasterResource</title>
		<link>http://www.masterresource.org/2009/09/even-the-generals-are-worried-can-you-spell-m-i-s-s-i-o-n-c-r-e-e-p-climate-change-and-national-security-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-2798</link>
		<dc:creator>MasterResource Surpasses 200,000 Views; Continues to Attract New Talent (3rd Quarter Report) &#8212; MasterResource</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 06:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masterresource.org/?p=4611#comment-2798</guid>
		<description>[...] but lie in waiting for future appreciation, one example being Marlo Lewis&#8217;s two-part study (here and here) on the peculiar, controversial, and dangerous national-security rationale for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] but lie in waiting for future appreciation, one example being Marlo Lewis&#8217;s two-part study (here and here) on the peculiar, controversial, and dangerous national-security rationale for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Even the Generals are Worried! Mission Creep, Climate Change, and National Security (Part 2) &#8212; MasterResource</title>
		<link>http://www.masterresource.org/2009/09/even-the-generals-are-worried-can-you-spell-m-i-s-s-i-o-n-c-r-e-e-p-climate-change-and-national-security-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-2799</link>
		<dc:creator>Even the Generals are Worried! Mission Creep, Climate Change, and National Security (Part 2) &#8212; MasterResource</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 16:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masterresource.org/?p=4611#comment-2799</guid>
		<description>[...] Partnership for a Secure America (PSA) briefing on climate change, energy and national security. Yesterday’s post made two main points: (1) The strange-bedfellow coalition of defense hawks and eco-warriers is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Partnership for a Secure America (PSA) briefing on climate change, energy and national security. Yesterday’s post made two main points: (1) The strange-bedfellow coalition of defense hawks and eco-warriers is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Celebrity Paycut - Encouraging celebrities all over the world to save us from global warming by taking a paycut.</title>
		<link>http://www.masterresource.org/2009/09/even-the-generals-are-worried-can-you-spell-m-i-s-s-i-o-n-c-r-e-e-p-climate-change-and-national-security-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-2335</link>
		<dc:creator>Celebrity Paycut - Encouraging celebrities all over the world to save us from global warming by taking a paycut.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 15:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masterresource.org/?p=4611#comment-2335</guid>
		<description>[...] week, on the free-market energy blog MasterResource.Org, I posted a two-part column on climate change and national security. In a nutshell, I argued that global warming [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] week, on the free-market energy blog MasterResource.Org, I posted a two-part column on climate change and national security. In a nutshell, I argued that global warming [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will climate change cause water wars? Will Waxman-Markey enhance U.S. energy security? No and No.&#160;&#124;&#160;OpenMarket.org</title>
		<link>http://www.masterresource.org/2009/09/even-the-generals-are-worried-can-you-spell-m-i-s-s-i-o-n-c-r-e-e-p-climate-change-and-national-security-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-2334</link>
		<dc:creator>Will climate change cause water wars? Will Waxman-Markey enhance U.S. energy security? No and No.&#160;&#124;&#160;OpenMarket.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masterresource.org/?p=4611#comment-2334</guid>
		<description>[...] week, on the free-market energy blog MasterResource.Org, I posted a two-part column on climate change and national security. In a nutshell, I argued that global warming [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] week, on the free-market energy blog MasterResource.Org, I posted a two-part column on climate change and national security. In a nutshell, I argued that global warming [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.masterresource.org/2009/09/even-the-generals-are-worried-can-you-spell-m-i-s-s-i-o-n-c-r-e-e-p-climate-change-and-national-security-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-2343</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 20:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masterresource.org/?p=4611#comment-2343</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s another economic model to check out: Nordhaus&#039; 100-yr &quot;cost-benefit&quot; analysis.  http://www.nybooks.com/articles/21494

Stern&#039;s and Gore&#039;s solutions have the very worst payoff.

The best comes from a hypothetical &quot;low-cost fallback&quot; clean cheap energy source.  Here it is:  focusfusion.org .  Power at ¼¢/kwh for everyone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s another economic model to check out: Nordhaus&#8217; 100-yr &#8220;cost-benefit&#8221; analysis.  <a href="http://www.nybooks.com/articles/21494" rel="nofollow">http://www.nybooks.com/articles/21494</a></p>
<p>Stern&#8217;s and Gore&#8217;s solutions have the very worst payoff.</p>
<p>The best comes from a hypothetical &#8220;low-cost fallback&#8221; clean cheap energy source.  Here it is:  focusfusion.org .  Power at ¼¢/kwh for everyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marlo Lewis</title>
		<link>http://www.masterresource.org/2009/09/even-the-generals-are-worried-can-you-spell-m-i-s-s-i-o-n-c-r-e-e-p-climate-change-and-national-security-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-2332</link>
		<dc:creator>Marlo Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 00:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masterresource.org/?p=4611#comment-2332</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Chip, for directing me to the Nature article on &quot;water wars&quot; -- a topic that figures so prominently in discussions of climate change as a &quot;threat multiplier.&quot; I may update my post after studying that article and your excellent commentary on World Climate Report.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Chip, for directing me to the Nature article on &#8220;water wars&#8221; &#8212; a topic that figures so prominently in discussions of climate change as a &#8220;threat multiplier.&#8221; I may update my post after studying that article and your excellent commentary on World Climate Report.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Climate policies endanger U.S. national security&#160;&#124;&#160;GlobalWarming.org</title>
		<link>http://www.masterresource.org/2009/09/even-the-generals-are-worried-can-you-spell-m-i-s-s-i-o-n-c-r-e-e-p-climate-change-and-national-security-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-2333</link>
		<dc:creator>Climate policies endanger U.S. national security&#160;&#124;&#160;GlobalWarming.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masterresource.org/?p=4611#comment-2333</guid>
		<description>[...] the Generals Are Worried! Mission Creep, Climate Change and National Security.” Part 1 shows that the “threat multiplier” argument is hype. Part 2 shows that climate change policy [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the Generals Are Worried! Mission Creep, Climate Change and National Security.” Part 1 shows that the “threat multiplier” argument is hype. Part 2 shows that climate change policy [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Hughes</title>
		<link>http://www.masterresource.org/2009/09/even-the-generals-are-worried-can-you-spell-m-i-s-s-i-o-n-c-r-e-e-p-climate-change-and-national-security-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-2342</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 01:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masterresource.org/?p=4611#comment-2342</guid>
		<description>Geologist Bob,you have some connected points,but geology is not the answer geometry is. This earth has been mined all over(Need proof? provide transport and per diem) Every &quot;Mountain here has been placed there. Grid science is one of the specialties taught to those from our school,and we understand how this planet actually operates and the connections everyone can observe and guess at the connectivity of the events observed,and yet they fail to observe very obvious events right in front of their face.
 Periodicities do cause all of our warming events and weather upticks,just as you spoke to the obvious weather events and the ice core carbons.
 Geo science just guessed at their science and everyone except the actual planet science men fell in line.
 We will have extra water and weather fo a while more(Did you just observe the months long lightning storms on Saturn?) It will abate,but when that big ball of energy comes through, we will accumulate extra water,and who can tell you how water can be formed without dreawing it from the water mass already in situ? A grid scientist can.
 Open your eyes,science men and become part of the fix of the mis-information that just destroys capital like a vacuum.
 The IPCC boys are chartlatans getting free vacations,and yoiu all bow to their absurd process as if they were gods,and the government does not have our help because we were shoved out to create the messes everywhere.
 The mis-information is purposeful................</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geologist Bob,you have some connected points,but geology is not the answer geometry is. This earth has been mined all over(Need proof? provide transport and per diem) Every &#8220;Mountain here has been placed there. Grid science is one of the specialties taught to those from our school,and we understand how this planet actually operates and the connections everyone can observe and guess at the connectivity of the events observed,and yet they fail to observe very obvious events right in front of their face.<br />
 Periodicities do cause all of our warming events and weather upticks,just as you spoke to the obvious weather events and the ice core carbons.<br />
 Geo science just guessed at their science and everyone except the actual planet science men fell in line.<br />
 We will have extra water and weather fo a while more(Did you just observe the months long lightning storms on Saturn?) It will abate,but when that big ball of energy comes through, we will accumulate extra water,and who can tell you how water can be formed without dreawing it from the water mass already in situ? A grid scientist can.<br />
 Open your eyes,science men and become part of the fix of the mis-information that just destroys capital like a vacuum.<br />
 The IPCC boys are chartlatans getting free vacations,and yoiu all bow to their absurd process as if they were gods,and the government does not have our help because we were shoved out to create the messes everywhere.<br />
 The mis-information is purposeful&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rbradley</title>
		<link>http://www.masterresource.org/2009/09/even-the-generals-are-worried-can-you-spell-m-i-s-s-i-o-n-c-r-e-e-p-climate-change-and-national-security-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-2341</link>
		<dc:creator>rbradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 01:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masterresource.org/?p=4611#comment-2341</guid>
		<description>&quot;National security&quot; has a long history as an argument for government intervention in energy markets.  It was an important part of the crude-oil proration debate in the 1920s and 1930s in the southwest oil states, as was oil tariffs and quotas during the same period.

&quot;National security&quot; was used for seizing refineries during World War II.

And of course it was part of the rationale for thhe Strategic Petroleum Reserve (est. 1975).

And now this....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;National security&#8221; has a long history as an argument for government intervention in energy markets.  It was an important part of the crude-oil proration debate in the 1920s and 1930s in the southwest oil states, as was oil tariffs and quotas during the same period.</p>
<p>&#8220;National security&#8221; was used for seizing refineries during World War II.</p>
<p>And of course it was part of the rationale for thhe Strategic Petroleum Reserve (est. 1975).</p>
<p>And now this&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
