Comments on: Roger Pielke Jr. Challenges Joe Romm: Looking for Intellectual Improvement http://www.masterresource.org/2009/08/roger-pielke-jr-challenges-joe-romm-looking-for-intellectual-improvement/ A free-market energy blog Sat, 20 Mar 2010 09:39:56 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: Houston’s Energy Citizens Rally (and why no evaluation by Chronicle editorial board?) | North Houston Tea Party Patriots http://www.masterresource.org/2009/08/roger-pielke-jr-challenges-joe-romm-looking-for-intellectual-improvement/comment-page-1/#comment-2113 Houston’s Energy Citizens Rally (and why no evaluation by Chronicle editorial board?) | North Houston Tea Party Patriots Sat, 29 Aug 2009 15:52:59 +0000 http://masterresource.org/?p=4081#comment-2113 [...] Roger Pielke Jr. Challenges Joe Romm: Looking for Intellectual Improvement [...] [...] Roger Pielke Jr. Challenges Joe Romm: Looking for Intellectual Improvement [...]

]]> By: More Deceit from Climate Progress, Center for American Progress (Is Joe Romm shooting himself in the foot?) — MasterResource http://www.masterresource.org/2009/08/roger-pielke-jr-challenges-joe-romm-looking-for-intellectual-improvement/comment-page-1/#comment-2110 More Deceit from Climate Progress, Center for American Progress (Is Joe Romm shooting himself in the foot?) — MasterResource Tue, 25 Aug 2009 06:02:29 +0000 http://masterresource.org/?p=4081#comment-2110 [...] obviously did not do much good, but I will repeat my previous plea made on August 7th at here at MasterResource: Improving the [...] [...] obviously did not do much good, but I will repeat my previous plea made on August 7th at here at MasterResource: Improving the [...]

]]> By: John Droz http://www.masterresource.org/2009/08/roger-pielke-jr-challenges-joe-romm-looking-for-intellectual-improvement/comment-page-1/#comment-2112 John Droz Fri, 07 Aug 2009 11:46:48 +0000 http://masterresource.org/?p=4081#comment-2112 A fourth suggestion for Dr. Romm: Take the formal stance that ALL positions on this matter must be vetted via scientific methodology. A fourth suggestion for Dr. Romm:

Take the formal stance that ALL positions on this matter must be vetted via scientific methodology.

]]> By: Andrew http://www.masterresource.org/2009/08/roger-pielke-jr-challenges-joe-romm-looking-for-intellectual-improvement/comment-page-1/#comment-2111 Andrew Fri, 07 Aug 2009 06:46:19 +0000 http://masterresource.org/?p=4081#comment-2111 Since Romm is attack a fellow Andrew (we stick together ;) )-ol' Andy Revkin, who I usually enjoy having a little fun at the expense of-I feel I must point out that he is bringing out the old canard of models underestimating warming. This is based on, to my knowledge, some work by Stefan Rahmstorf-work which has been totally discredited, to the point of him needed to cheat to save face: http://landshape.org/enm/rahmstorf-2007-discredited/ Quite a scandal! More over, I just recently calculated the trend in UAH LT trend up to the most recent month (July, which Roy posted up the values on his site) from all the way back to April of 1997-there is NO positive trend over that period-I don't know if that's outside the confidence limits of model LT trends over this period for that length of time, but I'd bet my hat on it. It certainly isn't <i>greater</i> than .2 degrees C per decade. Since Romm is attack a fellow Andrew (we stick together ;) )-ol’ Andy Revkin, who I usually enjoy having a little fun at the expense of-I feel I must point out that he is bringing out the old canard of models underestimating warming. This is based on, to my knowledge, some work by Stefan Rahmstorf-work which has been totally discredited, to the point of him needed to cheat to save face:
http://landshape.org/enm/rahmstorf-2007-discredited/

Quite a scandal!

More over, I just recently calculated the trend in UAH LT trend up to the most recent month (July, which Roy posted up the values on his site) from all the way back to April of 1997-there is NO positive trend over that period-I don’t know if that’s outside the confidence limits of model LT trends over this period for that length of time, but I’d bet my hat on it. It certainly isn’t greater than .2 degrees C per decade.

]]>