Comments on: Environmentalists Questioning Windpower Should Scrutinize Climate Alarmism

By: Tom Stacy

Tom Stacy — Sat, 08 Aug 2009 01:58:41 +0000

If a congealing force were bestowed on the entire true scientific community, along with the courage to march on Washington and the financial freedom to eliminate cost as an issue, perhaps the nation’s leaders would listen. Is John Droz, Jr. this congealing force? I, for one, vote yes!

By: Charles Higley

Charles Higley — Tue, 04 Aug 2009 02:21:10 +0000

“The “Global Warming Theory” is one possible explanation of Climate Change. The basic premise behind this hypothesis is that Climate Change is man-made (anthropological), primarily due to introducing an increase in CO2, etc. into the atmosphere through activities like burning fossil fuels. To be sure, there are good, credible people with sound scientific evidence to support this theory.”

To be a bit more critical, there is not a shred of defendable scientific data which supports GWT or AGW based on CO2. CO2 always follows temperature changes, not the reverse. CO2 has been much higher than now three times in the last 200 years (550 ppm in the 1940s). Computer models are simply not science. And GWT ignores solar and water vapor influences which are enormous factors compared to a trace gas in the atmosphere and some fraudulent IPCC graphs.

C Higley, PhD Biochem

By: Worth Re-reading Weekend (MasterResource works for lazy summer days too) — MasterResource

Sat, 01 Aug 2009 11:58:22 +0000

[...] Environmentalists Questioning Windpower Should Scrutinize Climate Alarmism [...]

By: John Droz

John Droz — Wed, 29 Jul 2009 12:19:48 +0000

For anyone who would like more info — including dozens of references — please see my full paper at “http://www.northnet.org/brvmug/WindPower/GlobalWarmingPosition2.pdf”.

By: Wind Power Basics | Solar Power Systems - Renewable Energy - Nature Powered

Wind Power Basics | Solar Power Systems - Renewable Energy - Nature Powered — Tue, 28 Jul 2009 02:33:55 +0000

[...] Environmentalists Now Questioning Windpower [...]

By: Bill

Bill — Mon, 27 Jul 2009 12:26:40 +0000

As a scientist I am sure that you are aware that there are direct and indirect results from various causations. For instance it is likely that the manufacturing processes alone could increase the CO2 production through the use of fossil fuel burning – an indirect cause. An opposite indirect change in CO2 production could result from wind energy generation by possibly requiring less energy use from CO2 producing energy sources i.e replacing existing energy production.

You have some very good reasoning in your article. Thank You