<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &quot;Dirty&quot; Waxman-Markey: How Small Can Small Get?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.masterresource.org/2009/05/dirty-waxman-markey-how-small-can-small-get/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.masterresource.org/2009/05/dirty-waxman-markey-how-small-can-small-get/</link>
	<description>A free-market energy blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 20:41:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Policy Peril Segment 6: Cap and Trade&#160;&#124;&#160;OpenMarket.org</title>
		<link>http://www.masterresource.org/2009/05/dirty-waxman-markey-how-small-can-small-get/comment-page-1/#comment-1499</link>
		<dc:creator>Policy Peril Segment 6: Cap and Trade&#160;&#124;&#160;OpenMarket.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 20:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masterresource.org/?p=2515#comment-1499</guid>
		<description>[...] blog, Masterresource.Org has written brilliantly and extensively on these matters (see here, here, here, here, and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] blog, Masterresource.Org has written brilliantly and extensively on these matters (see here, here, here, here, and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Analyzing the effects of Waxman-Markey @</title>
		<link>http://www.masterresource.org/2009/05/dirty-waxman-markey-how-small-can-small-get/comment-page-1/#comment-1498</link>
		<dc:creator>Analyzing the effects of Waxman-Markey @</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masterresource.org/?p=2515#comment-1498</guid>
		<description>[...] Foundation analysis is here, and MasterSource, a free market energy site, is here.   Category: Economics, Energy, Global Warming, Politics  You can follow any responses to this entry [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Foundation analysis is here, and MasterSource, a free market energy site, is here.   Category: Economics, Energy, Global Warming, Politics  You can follow any responses to this entry [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Waxman-Markey Clothier for the Emperor: A Climate Parable (response to RealClimate) &#8212; MasterResource</title>
		<link>http://www.masterresource.org/2009/05/dirty-waxman-markey-how-small-can-small-get/comment-page-1/#comment-1497</link>
		<dc:creator>Waxman-Markey Clothier for the Emperor: A Climate Parable (response to RealClimate) &#8212; MasterResource</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 12:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masterresource.org/?p=2515#comment-1497</guid>
		<description>[...] he has nothing on!” cried a small, but persistent voice. “His expensive ideas do nothing to change the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] he has nothing on!” cried a small, but persistent voice. “His expensive ideas do nothing to change the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cap-and-Trade: The Temple of Enron (James Hansen makes an important political point) &#8212; MasterResource</title>
		<link>http://www.masterresource.org/2009/05/dirty-waxman-markey-how-small-can-small-get/comment-page-1/#comment-1496</link>
		<dc:creator>Cap-and-Trade: The Temple of Enron (James Hansen makes an important political point) &#8212; MasterResource</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 06:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masterresource.org/?p=2515#comment-1496</guid>
		<description>[...] out only about 3 percent of the human influence on climate (according to IPCC model projections), equating to about 0.09°F, this is an insurance policy with virtually no redemption [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] out only about 3 percent of the human influence on climate (according to IPCC model projections), equating to about 0.09°F, this is an insurance policy with virtually no redemption [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Reid</title>
		<link>http://www.masterresource.org/2009/05/dirty-waxman-markey-how-small-can-small-get/comment-page-1/#comment-1494</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Reid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 17:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masterresource.org/?p=2515#comment-1494</guid>
		<description>Carbonicus,

The investment required to actually reduce carbon emissions by 83% by 2050 would be ~4.9% of GDP each year, without the impact of a carbon tax or allowance auction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carbonicus,</p>
<p>The investment required to actually reduce carbon emissions by 83% by 2050 would be ~4.9% of GDP each year, without the impact of a carbon tax or allowance auction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.masterresource.org/2009/05/dirty-waxman-markey-how-small-can-small-get/comment-page-1/#comment-1493</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 16:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masterresource.org/?p=2515#comment-1493</guid>
		<description>Considering that the original post triggered a bunch of &quot;Yeah, but we won&#039;t go it alone!&quot; nonsense, the starting quote is apropos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Considering that the original post triggered a bunch of &#8220;Yeah, but we won&#8217;t go it alone!&#8221; nonsense, the starting quote is apropos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carbonicus</title>
		<link>http://www.masterresource.org/2009/05/dirty-waxman-markey-how-small-can-small-get/comment-page-1/#comment-1495</link>
		<dc:creator>Carbonicus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 15:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masterresource.org/?p=2515#comment-1495</guid>
		<description>Thanks for another great analysis, Chip.

Spending 2-4% of GDP ANNUALLY for an outcome that is less than natural climate variability will be one of the worst policies in terms of cost/benefit  in the history of the U.S.

Doing so at a time of enormous economic expansion would be bad enough.  Doing so while in a recession, or as the U.S. economy struggles to emerge from one, would be somewhere between sophomoric and down right stupid.

But remember, this isn&#039;t about saving the planet, humans, animal species, or avoiding a humanitarian disaster.  This is about global government coordination and control, about de-industrializing the industrialized world, about punishing capitalism, about punishing energy consumption, about punishing fossil fuels, about subsidizing the development of the developing world, and about funding wealth redistribution here in American to ensure more votes in 2010 and 2012.

And if you and your elected officials allow cap and trade or any form of carbon tax to become law, don&#039;t be surprised if this is exactly what you get, in addition to a lower rate of economic growth, reduced personal wealth, higher energy bills, higher food prices, higher prices for all consumer goods, and more government intrusion into your choices (the car you drive, your electricity usage, and much more).

Wake up, America. And do it QUICK!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for another great analysis, Chip.</p>
<p>Spending 2-4% of GDP ANNUALLY for an outcome that is less than natural climate variability will be one of the worst policies in terms of cost/benefit  in the history of the U.S.</p>
<p>Doing so at a time of enormous economic expansion would be bad enough.  Doing so while in a recession, or as the U.S. economy struggles to emerge from one, would be somewhere between sophomoric and down right stupid.</p>
<p>But remember, this isn&#8217;t about saving the planet, humans, animal species, or avoiding a humanitarian disaster.  This is about global government coordination and control, about de-industrializing the industrialized world, about punishing capitalism, about punishing energy consumption, about punishing fossil fuels, about subsidizing the development of the developing world, and about funding wealth redistribution here in American to ensure more votes in 2010 and 2012.</p>
<p>And if you and your elected officials allow cap and trade or any form of carbon tax to become law, don&#8217;t be surprised if this is exactly what you get, in addition to a lower rate of economic growth, reduced personal wealth, higher energy bills, higher food prices, higher prices for all consumer goods, and more government intrusion into your choices (the car you drive, your electricity usage, and much more).</p>
<p>Wake up, America. And do it QUICK!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

