<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Endangerment Finding: Legislative Hammer or Suicide Note?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.masterresource.org/2009/04/endangerment-finding-legislative-hammer-or-suicide-note/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.masterresource.org/2009/04/endangerment-finding-legislative-hammer-or-suicide-note/</link>
	<description>A free-market energy blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 20:41:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sen. Lindsey Graham&#8217;s Me-Too Kyotoism (will he snatch defeat from the jaws of victory?) &#8212; MasterResource</title>
		<link>http://www.masterresource.org/2009/04/endangerment-finding-legislative-hammer-or-suicide-note/comment-page-1/#comment-2570</link>
		<dc:creator>Sen. Lindsey Graham&#8217;s Me-Too Kyotoism (will he snatch defeat from the jaws of victory?) &#8212; MasterResource</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 06:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masterresource.org/?p=1889#comment-2570</guid>
		<description>[...] legislative hammer to beat cap-and-trade opponents into submission. But, as I discuss in a previous post, this &#8216;come along quietly or we&#8217;ll let EPA muss ya up&#8217; talk is too clever by [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] legislative hammer to beat cap-and-trade opponents into submission. But, as I discuss in a previous post, this &#8216;come along quietly or we&#8217;ll let EPA muss ya up&#8217; talk is too clever by [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How long will Sen. Barrasso&#8217;s &#8220;hold&#8221; on Regina McCarthy hold? &#160;&#124;&#160;OpenMarket.org</title>
		<link>http://www.masterresource.org/2009/04/endangerment-finding-legislative-hammer-or-suicide-note/comment-page-1/#comment-982</link>
		<dc:creator>How long will Sen. Barrasso&#8217;s &#8220;hold&#8221; on Regina McCarthy hold? &#160;&#124;&#160;OpenMarket.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 22:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masterresource.org/?p=1889#comment-982</guid>
		<description>[...] legislation foes into submission. This is too clever by half, however, as I argue here and here. If EPA does bring the might and fury of the Clean Air Act down upon the economy, Obama will have [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] legislation foes into submission. This is too clever by half, however, as I argue here and here. If EPA does bring the might and fury of the Clean Air Act down upon the economy, Obama will have [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Poll Indicates More People Skeptical of Man-Made Climate Change Theory &#171; Ancavge</title>
		<link>http://www.masterresource.org/2009/04/endangerment-finding-legislative-hammer-or-suicide-note/comment-page-1/#comment-981</link>
		<dc:creator>Poll Indicates More People Skeptical of Man-Made Climate Change Theory &#171; Ancavge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 19:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masterresource.org/?p=1889#comment-981</guid>
		<description>[...] ready to cave in to EPA, Waxman or the president on this issue ought to have his head [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ready to cave in to EPA, Waxman or the president on this issue ought to have his head [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EPA to regulate GHGs, or urge congress to act &#187; Mind of Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.masterresource.org/2009/04/endangerment-finding-legislative-hammer-or-suicide-note/comment-page-1/#comment-971</link>
		<dc:creator>EPA to regulate GHGs, or urge congress to act &#187; Mind of Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 22:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masterresource.org/?p=1889#comment-971</guid>
		<description>[...] in particular is interesting. Marlo Lewis, of the pro-business Competitive Enterprise Institute, figures the EPA’s ruling amounts to a “suicide note.” That is, far from prodding Congress to pass [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in particular is interesting. Marlo Lewis, of the pro-business Competitive Enterprise Institute, figures the EPA’s ruling amounts to a “suicide note.” That is, far from prodding Congress to pass [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The American Spectator : AmSpecBlog : Even Greater Disbelief of Alarmists</title>
		<link>http://www.masterresource.org/2009/04/endangerment-finding-legislative-hammer-or-suicide-note/comment-page-1/#comment-979</link>
		<dc:creator>The American Spectator : AmSpecBlog : Even Greater Disbelief of Alarmists</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 18:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masterresource.org/?p=1889#comment-979</guid>
		<description>[...] ready to cave in to EPA, Waxman or the president on this issue ought to have his head [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ready to cave in to EPA, Waxman or the president on this issue ought to have his head [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Even Greater Disbelief of Alarmists&#160;&#124;&#160;GlobalWarming.org</title>
		<link>http://www.masterresource.org/2009/04/endangerment-finding-legislative-hammer-or-suicide-note/comment-page-1/#comment-972</link>
		<dc:creator>Even Greater Disbelief of Alarmists&#160;&#124;&#160;GlobalWarming.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 18:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masterresource.org/?p=1889#comment-972</guid>
		<description>[...] ready to cave in to EPA, Waxman or the president on this issue ought to have his head [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ready to cave in to EPA, Waxman or the president on this issue ought to have his head [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sid Malik</title>
		<link>http://www.masterresource.org/2009/04/endangerment-finding-legislative-hammer-or-suicide-note/comment-page-1/#comment-975</link>
		<dc:creator>Sid Malik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 05:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masterresource.org/?p=1889#comment-975</guid>
		<description>The move is expected to &quot;halt economic progress&quot; by &quot;increasing consumer good prices&quot; is the argument above. However, unless there is a significant advancement with fossil fuels, they too will directly impact consumer prices, as we will find ourselves dealing with &quot;hard to drill, more expensive though abundant&quot; fossil fuels. All above arguments have to be considered in light of end of the era of &quot;cheap&quot; fossil fuels. How much $$ are the two options (do nothing and continue with fossil VS. support renewables) worth on a lifecycle basis should be a discussion involving not only economists, but also geologists &amp; technologists (drilling experts). Discount that escalation in consumer prices or value of future subsidies required to fund fossil fuels-- it is only then you get a REAL economics &amp; determine if consumers will benefit or not. Any other analysis approach adopted will only result in unleveled playing field &amp; subjective discussions, whereas the need of the hour is fact-based objective approach.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The move is expected to &#8220;halt economic progress&#8221; by &#8220;increasing consumer good prices&#8221; is the argument above. However, unless there is a significant advancement with fossil fuels, they too will directly impact consumer prices, as we will find ourselves dealing with &#8220;hard to drill, more expensive though abundant&#8221; fossil fuels. All above arguments have to be considered in light of end of the era of &#8220;cheap&#8221; fossil fuels. How much $$ are the two options (do nothing and continue with fossil VS. support renewables) worth on a lifecycle basis should be a discussion involving not only economists, but also geologists &amp; technologists (drilling experts). Discount that escalation in consumer prices or value of future subsidies required to fund fossil fuels&#8211; it is only then you get a REAL economics &amp; determine if consumers will benefit or not. Any other analysis approach adopted will only result in unleveled playing field &amp; subjective discussions, whereas the need of the hour is fact-based objective approach.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: henessy</title>
		<link>http://www.masterresource.org/2009/04/endangerment-finding-legislative-hammer-or-suicide-note/comment-page-1/#comment-980</link>
		<dc:creator>henessy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 21:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masterresource.org/?p=1889#comment-980</guid>
		<description>the nation elected these crazeys--and  now we will pay for that mistake...the next election/nov 2010- will be the most intence in a long while..jjh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the nation elected these crazeys&#8211;and  now we will pay for that mistake&#8230;the next election/nov 2010- will be the most intence in a long while..jjh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shopfloor » Blog Archive &#187; Others Comment on EPA&#8217;s Proposed Endangerment</title>
		<link>http://www.masterresource.org/2009/04/endangerment-finding-legislative-hammer-or-suicide-note/comment-page-1/#comment-978</link>
		<dc:creator>Shopfloor » Blog Archive &#187; Others Comment on EPA&#8217;s Proposed Endangerment</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 19:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masterresource.org/?p=1889#comment-978</guid>
		<description>[...] Competitive Enterprise Institute, Marlo Lewis, &#8220;Endangerment finding: Legislative Hammer or Suicide Note?&#8221;: The CO2 litigation campaign that begat Massachusetts v. EPA turns out to be too clever by half. As Roger Pielke, Jr. and Michael Shellenberger astutely observe, Team Obama’s threat to regulate greenhouse gases via the Clean Air Act (CAA) unless Congress enacts cap-and-tax legislation is tantamount to a promise to commit political suicide. However costly cap-and-tax might be, litigation-driven CAA regulation of greenhouse gases is potentially far more damaging to the economy. Instead of being a hammer that beats opponents into submission, EPA’s forthcoming endangerment finding–the first step in regulating greenhouse gases under the CAA–should strengthen Congressional Republicans’ resolve to fight cap-and-tax. By doing so, they will ensure that Obama and his allies bear all the blame for raising consumer energy prices, destroying jobs, and de-stimulating the economy. For further discussion, see my post on MasterResource.Org. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Competitive Enterprise Institute, Marlo Lewis, &#8220;Endangerment finding: Legislative Hammer or Suicide Note?&#8221;: The CO2 litigation campaign that begat Massachusetts v. EPA turns out to be too clever by half. As Roger Pielke, Jr. and Michael Shellenberger astutely observe, Team Obama’s threat to regulate greenhouse gases via the Clean Air Act (CAA) unless Congress enacts cap-and-tax legislation is tantamount to a promise to commit political suicide. However costly cap-and-tax might be, litigation-driven CAA regulation of greenhouse gases is potentially far more damaging to the economy. Instead of being a hammer that beats opponents into submission, EPA’s forthcoming endangerment finding–the first step in regulating greenhouse gases under the CAA–should strengthen Congressional Republicans’ resolve to fight cap-and-tax. By doing so, they will ensure that Obama and his allies bear all the blame for raising consumer energy prices, destroying jobs, and de-stimulating the economy. For further discussion, see my post on MasterResource.Org. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wall Street Journal &#187; Blog Archive &#187; EPA: ‘Overwhelming’ Cause to Regulate Greenhouse-Gas Emissions</title>
		<link>http://www.masterresource.org/2009/04/endangerment-finding-legislative-hammer-or-suicide-note/comment-page-1/#comment-977</link>
		<dc:creator>Wall Street Journal &#187; Blog Archive &#187; EPA: ‘Overwhelming’ Cause to Regulate Greenhouse-Gas Emissions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 19:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masterresource.org/?p=1889#comment-977</guid>
		<description>[...] in particular is interesting. Marlo Lewis, of the pro-business Competitive Enterprise Institute, figures the EPA’s ruling amounts to a “suicide note.” That is, far from prodding Congress to pass [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in particular is interesting. Marlo Lewis, of the pro-business Competitive Enterprise Institute, figures the EPA’s ruling amounts to a “suicide note.” That is, far from prodding Congress to pass [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

