<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windpower: Yet Another Texas-sized Problem (Hurricane Risk)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.masterresource.org/2009/02/windpower-yet-another-texas-sized-problem-hurricane-risk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.masterresource.org/2009/02/windpower-yet-another-texas-sized-problem-hurricane-risk/</link>
	<description>A free-market energy blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 20:41:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Tanton</title>
		<link>http://www.masterresource.org/2009/02/windpower-yet-another-texas-sized-problem-hurricane-risk/comment-page-1/#comment-460</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Tanton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 00:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masterresource.org/?p=919#comment-460</guid>
		<description>So wind represents a risk if the wind blows?  Guess what, it represents a risk when the wind DOESN&#039;T blow--truly a technology for all seasons!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So wind represents a risk if the wind blows?  Guess what, it represents a risk when the wind DOESN&#8217;T blow&#8211;truly a technology for all seasons!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mack Thrasher</title>
		<link>http://www.masterresource.org/2009/02/windpower-yet-another-texas-sized-problem-hurricane-risk/comment-page-1/#comment-459</link>
		<dc:creator>Mack Thrasher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masterresource.org/?p=919#comment-459</guid>
		<description>Given the fact that carbon dioxide and human activity have nothing to do with climate change, there are better ways to produce energy. Wind could play a small role in energy production on an individual way especially in rural areas, such as farms and homes if it were subsidized by governments through a tax credit and on a smaller scale and piped in to a homes electicle system. In ten years we will realize we have been had and these turbines will just be enefficient eye sores, but some one will have made a pile of money by alarming the mass population and forcing governments to impliment this junk.
 Given the world econmy we should revert back to clean coal, fossil fuels, and pebble bed nuclear power which is safe and clean, no rods to dispose of and you can put six of them in three foot ball feilds so they could be installed closer to the load.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given the fact that carbon dioxide and human activity have nothing to do with climate change, there are better ways to produce energy. Wind could play a small role in energy production on an individual way especially in rural areas, such as farms and homes if it were subsidized by governments through a tax credit and on a smaller scale and piped in to a homes electicle system. In ten years we will realize we have been had and these turbines will just be enefficient eye sores, but some one will have made a pile of money by alarming the mass population and forcing governments to impliment this junk.<br />
 Given the world econmy we should revert back to clean coal, fossil fuels, and pebble bed nuclear power which is safe and clean, no rods to dispose of and you can put six of them in three foot ball feilds so they could be installed closer to the load.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

