<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Pitfalls in Job Counting (&quot;Green&quot; jobs versus economic jobs)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.masterresource.org/2009/02/the-pitfalls-in-job-counting-green-jobs-versus-economic-jobs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.masterresource.org/2009/02/the-pitfalls-in-job-counting-green-jobs-versus-economic-jobs/</link>
	<description>A free-market energy blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 20:41:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomas J. Nally</title>
		<link>http://www.masterresource.org/2009/02/the-pitfalls-in-job-counting-green-jobs-versus-economic-jobs/comment-page-1/#comment-516</link>
		<dc:creator>Tomas J. Nally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 07:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masterresource.org/?p=1023#comment-516</guid>
		<description>The stimulus plan, as a whole, is not a jobs creator.  It will be a jobs destroyer compared to alternate uses of $800 billion.  The reason is so simple that...well...I dare say even an elected politician could understand it.

Basically, the reason that public sector spending destroys jobs is because it takes the federal government $1.25 to procure the same amount of goods and services that can be procurred in the private sector for $1.00.   This phenomenon could go by the simple name of &quot;inefficiency&quot;, but I prefer to call it &quot;the degraded purchasing power of the federal dollar&quot;.

When $0.25 of purchasing power is lost billions and billions of times over, that represents hundreds of thousands of jobs that will never come into existence because the federal government is spending those dollars instead of the private sector entities from whom those dollars were extracted.

Why can private sector entities make more happen with a dollar than the federal government?  This is equally easy to understand.  Private entities have a duty to the &quot;bottom line&quot;.  Elected officials have a duty to their reelection.

But those politicians who are genuinely concerned for the American people will want dollars to remain where their purchasing power -- and job creation power -- is maximized.  In the hands of the people and companies who created those dollars in the first place.

---Tom Nally, New Orleans</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The stimulus plan, as a whole, is not a jobs creator.  It will be a jobs destroyer compared to alternate uses of $800 billion.  The reason is so simple that&#8230;well&#8230;I dare say even an elected politician could understand it.</p>
<p>Basically, the reason that public sector spending destroys jobs is because it takes the federal government $1.25 to procure the same amount of goods and services that can be procurred in the private sector for $1.00.   This phenomenon could go by the simple name of &#8220;inefficiency&#8221;, but I prefer to call it &#8220;the degraded purchasing power of the federal dollar&#8221;.</p>
<p>When $0.25 of purchasing power is lost billions and billions of times over, that represents hundreds of thousands of jobs that will never come into existence because the federal government is spending those dollars instead of the private sector entities from whom those dollars were extracted.</p>
<p>Why can private sector entities make more happen with a dollar than the federal government?  This is equally easy to understand.  Private entities have a duty to the &#8220;bottom line&#8221;.  Elected officials have a duty to their reelection.</p>
<p>But those politicians who are genuinely concerned for the American people will want dollars to remain where their purchasing power &#8212; and job creation power &#8212; is maximized.  In the hands of the people and companies who created those dollars in the first place.</p>
<p>&#8212;Tom Nally, New Orleans</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wall Street Journal &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Green Jobs: The ‘Fiscally Conservative’ Stimulus Spending</title>
		<link>http://www.masterresource.org/2009/02/the-pitfalls-in-job-counting-green-jobs-versus-economic-jobs/comment-page-1/#comment-515</link>
		<dc:creator>Wall Street Journal &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Green Jobs: The ‘Fiscally Conservative’ Stimulus Spending</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 21:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masterresource.org/?p=1023#comment-515</guid>
		<description>[...] nature of many clean-energy projects, from retrofitting buildings to installing solar panels. Detractors see a fatal flaw precisely in the labor-intensive nature of green jobs, since that amounts to lower [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] nature of many clean-energy projects, from retrofitting buildings to installing solar panels. Detractors see a fatal flaw precisely in the labor-intensive nature of green jobs, since that amounts to lower [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Environmental Capital - WSJ.com : Green Jobs: The 'Fiscally Conservative' Stimulus Spending</title>
		<link>http://www.masterresource.org/2009/02/the-pitfalls-in-job-counting-green-jobs-versus-economic-jobs/comment-page-1/#comment-514</link>
		<dc:creator>Environmental Capital - WSJ.com : Green Jobs: The 'Fiscally Conservative' Stimulus Spending</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masterresource.org/?p=1023#comment-514</guid>
		<description>[...] nature of many clean-energy projects, from retrofitting buildings to installing solar panels. Detractors see a fatal flaw precisely in the labor-intensive nature of green jobs, since that amounts to lower [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] nature of many clean-energy projects, from retrofitting buildings to installing solar panels. Detractors see a fatal flaw precisely in the labor-intensive nature of green jobs, since that amounts to lower [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

