<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Do the Alarmists Feel Bad About Debates&#8211;and Debating?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.masterresource.org/2009/01/why-do-the-alarmists-feel-bad-about-debates-and-debating/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.masterresource.org/2009/01/why-do-the-alarmists-feel-bad-about-debates-and-debating/</link>
	<description>A free-market energy blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 20:41:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TokyoTom</title>
		<link>http://www.masterresource.org/2009/01/why-do-the-alarmists-feel-bad-about-debates-and-debating/comment-page-1/#comment-227</link>
		<dc:creator>TokyoTom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 04:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masterresource.org/?p=455#comment-227</guid>
		<description>Well Rob, Joe Romm isn&#039;t ALL alarmists, but I&#039;d say it&#039;s rather clear that he&#039;s saying that &quot;scientists&quot; are not good policy debaters - as it&#039;s something that they&#039;re not trained in.  I suppose you would hardly disagree.

On top of that, Joe Romm and others simply are not trained in public choice or Austrian perspectives on political economy issues, so he clearly doesn&#039;t understand what Jerry patiently tries to explain.  But there&#039;s rather alot of that to go around - across the political spectrum and on many, many issues -  and I rather fail to understand how mocking that who lack understanding is a good way to open their minds to how wealth creation occurs and to the perils of using the state.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Rob, Joe Romm isn&#8217;t ALL alarmists, but I&#8217;d say it&#8217;s rather clear that he&#8217;s saying that &#8220;scientists&#8221; are not good policy debaters &#8211; as it&#8217;s something that they&#8217;re not trained in.  I suppose you would hardly disagree.</p>
<p>On top of that, Joe Romm and others simply are not trained in public choice or Austrian perspectives on political economy issues, so he clearly doesn&#8217;t understand what Jerry patiently tries to explain.  But there&#8217;s rather alot of that to go around &#8211; across the political spectrum and on many, many issues &#8211;  and I rather fail to understand how mocking that who lack understanding is a good way to open their minds to how wealth creation occurs and to the perils of using the state.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rbradley</title>
		<link>http://www.masterresource.org/2009/01/why-do-the-alarmists-feel-bad-about-debates-and-debating/comment-page-1/#comment-226</link>
		<dc:creator>rbradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 15:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masterresource.org/?p=455#comment-226</guid>
		<description>[RLB: There is a cross post at NRO by Chris Horner, &quot;Twenty Paces,&quot; published on Monday, January 26: http://planetgore.nationalreview.com/]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[RLB: There is a cross post at NRO by Chris Horner, "Twenty Paces," published on Monday, January 26: <a href="http://planetgore.nationalreview.com/" rel="nofollow">http://planetgore.nationalreview.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

