<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Offshore Drilling: Why Not?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.masterresource.org/2009/01/offshore-drilling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.masterresource.org/2009/01/offshore-drilling/</link>
	<description>A free-market energy blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:44:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gusher of Deciet at The Simple Facts</title>
		<link>http://www.masterresource.org/2009/01/offshore-drilling/comment-page-1/#comment-11084</link>
		<dc:creator>Gusher of Deciet at The Simple Facts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 18:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masterresource.org/?p=252#comment-11084</guid>
		<description>[...] out oil from foreign sources isn’t safe either. The National Academy of Sciences estimates that four times as much oil is spilled from tankers as there is from oil exploration. And the less we drill at [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] out oil from foreign sources isn’t safe either. The National Academy of Sciences estimates that four times as much oil is spilled from tankers as there is from oil exploration. And the less we drill at [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mick C Pitlick</title>
		<link>http://www.masterresource.org/2009/01/offshore-drilling/comment-page-1/#comment-135</link>
		<dc:creator>Mick C Pitlick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 15:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masterresource.org/?p=252#comment-135</guid>
		<description>The Big downsides: More production would provide pricing relief on the margin from OPEC squeeze - Baad, because would delay migration to more virtuous (and less economic) corn, wind and sun. Then if Big Oil prospered, they would have more political clout and become the last industry standing that is not a ward of the state.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Big downsides: More production would provide pricing relief on the margin from OPEC squeeze &#8211; Baad, because would delay migration to more virtuous (and less economic) corn, wind and sun. Then if Big Oil prospered, they would have more political clout and become the last industry standing that is not a ward of the state.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donkatsu</title>
		<link>http://www.masterresource.org/2009/01/offshore-drilling/comment-page-1/#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator>Donkatsu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 20:40:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masterresource.org/?p=252#comment-134</guid>
		<description>Energy independence is probably a hopeless concept as long as it is limited to domestic production of 100% of the btus used in the US economy.  However foolish is the concept of BTU independence, ridicule of it has been used to stifle a lot of economically worthwhile projects - look at how the Dems talk about offshore production or ANWR. But every time we reject a worthwhile project or policy because &quot;that one is not the magic bullet&quot; that will cure all woes, we burrow ever more deeply into second and third best solutions.  For example, we will never find out whether electric vehicles are worthwhile if our pricing system for utilities fails to distinguish by time of day.

There is another definition that is more operational and useful.  Energy independence occurs when we do not have to subordinate decisions outside the energy economy to our need for imported energy from specific sources or for the recycling of the funds that the sellers receive from such sales.

I seems to me that once we have taken the steps to produce what is economically feasible (and modified our domestic pricing and regulation to stem the leaks of economic efficiency in the energy sector) then we will have achieved a sense of independence that will make us substantially less susceptible to political and financial blackmail.  Kind of like the F*** you money they talk about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Energy independence is probably a hopeless concept as long as it is limited to domestic production of 100% of the btus used in the US economy.  However foolish is the concept of BTU independence, ridicule of it has been used to stifle a lot of economically worthwhile projects &#8211; look at how the Dems talk about offshore production or ANWR. But every time we reject a worthwhile project or policy because &#8220;that one is not the magic bullet&#8221; that will cure all woes, we burrow ever more deeply into second and third best solutions.  For example, we will never find out whether electric vehicles are worthwhile if our pricing system for utilities fails to distinguish by time of day.</p>
<p>There is another definition that is more operational and useful.  Energy independence occurs when we do not have to subordinate decisions outside the energy economy to our need for imported energy from specific sources or for the recycling of the funds that the sellers receive from such sales.</p>
<p>I seems to me that once we have taken the steps to produce what is economically feasible (and modified our domestic pricing and regulation to stem the leaks of economic efficiency in the energy sector) then we will have achieved a sense of independence that will make us substantially less susceptible to political and financial blackmail.  Kind of like the F*** you money they talk about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Tanton</title>
		<link>http://www.masterresource.org/2009/01/offshore-drilling/comment-page-1/#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Tanton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 00:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masterresource.org/?p=252#comment-133</guid>
		<description>In addition to less risk of tanker spill, drilling and producing in many areas also reduces resevoir pressure and seepage.  The ultimate goal should be to reduce oil in the water--reducing tanker traffic and seepage both are ways to do that, but take drilling and production to accomplish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In addition to less risk of tanker spill, drilling and producing in many areas also reduces resevoir pressure and seepage.  The ultimate goal should be to reduce oil in the water&#8211;reducing tanker traffic and seepage both are ways to do that, but take drilling and production to accomplish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

