<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Exxon Laughs all the Way to the Bank</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.masterresource.org/2009/01/exxon-laughs-all-the-way-to-the-bank/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.masterresource.org/2009/01/exxon-laughs-all-the-way-to-the-bank/</link>
	<description>A free-market energy blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:44:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Energy Reality Wins at Exxon Mobil Annual Meeting (Atlas is not shrugging at this substance-over-form company) &#8212; MasterResource</title>
		<link>http://www.masterresource.org/2009/01/exxon-laughs-all-the-way-to-the-bank/comment-page-1/#comment-176</link>
		<dc:creator>Energy Reality Wins at Exxon Mobil Annual Meeting (Atlas is not shrugging at this substance-over-form company) &#8212; MasterResource</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 18:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masterresource.org/?p=365#comment-176</guid>
		<description>[...] owners seem to agree. And company profitability has confirmed this strategy, as Michael Lynch has noted at MasterResource. Moreover, Exxon Mobil&#8217;s stick-to-the-basics strategy is now in favor at [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] owners seem to agree. And company profitability has confirmed this strategy, as Michael Lynch has noted at MasterResource. Moreover, Exxon Mobil&#8217;s stick-to-the-basics strategy is now in favor at [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregory Rehmke</title>
		<link>http://www.masterresource.org/2009/01/exxon-laughs-all-the-way-to-the-bank/comment-page-1/#comment-175</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregory Rehmke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 14:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masterresource.org/?p=365#comment-175</guid>
		<description>And in the oil crises of the 1970s many more were enthusiastic about government, calling for major oil companies to be nationalized.  Exxon and other diversified in part to have more employees and diverse political protection (i.e. jobs, votes and congressional seats representing their firms).  I remember Exxon or Mobil in the camera distribution business.  I would purchase expensive SLR cameras with a &quot;120 day trial&quot; period--then return them.  No one talks about nationalizing oil companies today (just banks, I guess).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And in the oil crises of the 1970s many more were enthusiastic about government, calling for major oil companies to be nationalized.  Exxon and other diversified in part to have more employees and diverse political protection (i.e. jobs, votes and congressional seats representing their firms).  I remember Exxon or Mobil in the camera distribution business.  I would purchase expensive SLR cameras with a &#8220;120 day trial&#8221; period&#8211;then return them.  No one talks about nationalizing oil companies today (just banks, I guess).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

